Need or opportunity? A study of innovations in equids.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 07 03 2021
accepted: 08 09 2021
entrez: 27 9 2021
pubmed: 28 9 2021
medline: 23 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Debate persists over whether animals develop innovative solutions primarily in response to needs or conversely whether they innovate more when basic needs are covered and opportunity to develop novel behaviour is offered. We sourced 746 cases of "unusual" behaviour in equids by contacting equid owners and caretakers directly and via a website (https://innovative-behaviour.org), and by searching the internet platforms YouTube and Facebook for videos. The study investigated whether differences in need or opportunity for innovation were reflected in the numbers of different types of innovations and in the frequencies of repeating a once-innovative behaviour (i) with respect to the equids' sex, age, and breed type, (ii) across behavioural categories, and whether (iii) they were affected by the equids' management (single vs group housing, access to roughage feed, access to pasture, and social contact). We found that the numbers of different types of innovation and the frequency of displaying specific innovations were not affected by individual characteristics (sex, age, breed or equid species). Few types of innovation in escape and foraging contexts were observed, whilst the comfort, play, and social contexts elicited the greatest variety of innovations. We also found higher numbers of different types of innovations in horses kept in groups rather than in individual housing, and with unlimited rather than with restricted access to pasture and roughage. Equids in permanent social contact performed high rates of once-innovative behaviour. We suggest that equids produce goal-directed innovations and repeat the behaviour at high frequency in response to urgent needs for food and free movement or when kept in conditions with social conflict. However, equids devise the greatest variety of innovations when opportunity to play and to develop comfort behaviour arises and when kept in good conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34570831
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257730
pii: PONE-D-21-07512
pmc: PMC8476013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0257730

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Comp Psychol (Baltim). 1945 Dec;38:367-83
pubmed: 21010765
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39280
pubmed: 22761752
Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Sep-Oct;36(5):562-72
pubmed: 19575315
Front Zool. 2014 Mar 26;11(1):20
pubmed: 24666734
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):431-9
pubmed: 18183432
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 7;279(1744):4087-95
pubmed: 22874748
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):75-84
pubmed: 18636282
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1950 Aug;43(4):289-94
pubmed: 15436888
Equine Vet J. 1995 Mar;27(2):86-91
pubmed: 7607155
Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):301-5
pubmed: 23271641
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5460-5
pubmed: 15784743
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 16;11(6):
pubmed: 34208615
Anim Behav. 2000 Jan;59(1):127-146
pubmed: 10640375
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 19;371(1690):
pubmed: 26926285
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61544
pubmed: 23630596
Brain Behav Evol. 2004;63(4):233-46
pubmed: 15084816
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 12;106(19):7893-8
pubmed: 19416834
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54997
pubmed: 23383025
Methods. 2007 May;42(1):12-21
pubmed: 17434411
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 22;9(5):
pubmed: 31121937
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:91-101
pubmed: 24220794
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 20;108(38):15898-903
pubmed: 21930936
Am J Primatol. 2005 Jun;66(2):167-88
pubmed: 15940712
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 9;9(1):11568
pubmed: 31399629
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41
pubmed: 11891325
Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt B:121-34
pubmed: 25245306
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218954
pubmed: 31242266
J Anim Sci. 1980 May;50(5):962-5
pubmed: 7390949
Vet Rec. 2002 Nov 30;151(22):658-62
pubmed: 12498408
Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):45-58
pubmed: 20640911
Equine Vet J. 2003 Mar;35(2):158-63
pubmed: 12638792
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):434-46
pubmed: 15584780
Behav Processes. 2007 Sep;76(1):1-13
pubmed: 17400403
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-6
pubmed: 27848045
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):645-55
pubmed: 24170136
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26553
pubmed: 22096487
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:54-62
pubmed: 26478251

Auteurs

Konstanze Krueger (K)

Department Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Nürtingen, Germany.
Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Laureen Esch (L)

Department Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Nürtingen, Germany.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Richard Byrne (R)

Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH