MARCO
Kupffer cells
MARCO
TIM4
liver
macrophages
regeneration
Journal
Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
16
08
2021
revised:
25
08
2021
accepted:
28
08
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Macrophages play a key role in liver regeneration. The fates of resident macrophages after 70% resection are poorly investigated. In this work, using the MARCO macrophage marker (abbreviated from macrophage receptor with collagenous structure), we studied the dynamics of mouse liver resident macrophages after 70% resection. In BALB/c male mice, a model of liver regeneration after 70% resection was reproduced. The dynamics of markers CD68, TIM4, and MARCO were studied immunohistochemically and by using a Western blot. The number of MARCO- and CD68-positive macrophages in the regenerating liver increased 1 day and 3 days after resection, respectively. At the same time, the content of the MARCO protein increased in the sorted macrophages of the regenerating liver on the third day. The data indicate that the number of MARCO-positive macrophages in the regenerating liver increases due to the activation of MARCO synthesis in the liver macrophages. The increased expression of MARCO by macrophages can be regarded as a sign of their activation. In the present study, stimulation with LPS led to an increase in the expression of the
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Macrophages play a key role in liver regeneration. The fates of resident macrophages after 70% resection are poorly investigated. In this work, using the MARCO macrophage marker (abbreviated from macrophage receptor with collagenous structure), we studied the dynamics of mouse liver resident macrophages after 70% resection.
METHODS
METHODS
In BALB/c male mice, a model of liver regeneration after 70% resection was reproduced. The dynamics of markers CD68, TIM4, and MARCO were studied immunohistochemically and by using a Western blot.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The number of MARCO- and CD68-positive macrophages in the regenerating liver increased 1 day and 3 days after resection, respectively. At the same time, the content of the MARCO protein increased in the sorted macrophages of the regenerating liver on the third day.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The data indicate that the number of MARCO-positive macrophages in the regenerating liver increases due to the activation of MARCO synthesis in the liver macrophages. The increased expression of MARCO by macrophages can be regarded as a sign of their activation. In the present study, stimulation with LPS led to an increase in the expression of the
Identifiants
pubmed: 34572315
pii: biomedicines9091129
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091129
pmc: PMC8471044
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : State Assignment
ID : 121040600409-1
Organisme : RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program
ID : RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program
Références
Immunity. 2019 Oct 15;51(4):638-654.e9
pubmed: 31561945
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021 Sep;22(9):608-624
pubmed: 34079104
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 06;7:40144
pubmed: 28057928
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Jul 21;8:661
pubmed: 32793601
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30675
pubmed: 22319576
Exp Cell Res. 2019 Oct 15;383(2):111542
pubmed: 31381879
Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005 Nov;287(1):4-13
pubmed: 16308859
Eur J Immunol. 2015 Sep;45(9):2484-93
pubmed: 26173808
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):9914-9
pubmed: 23716700
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 27;7:10321
pubmed: 26813785
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017 Jul 1;313(1):L138-L153
pubmed: 28408365
Genomics. 1999 May 15;58(1):82-9
pubmed: 10331948
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):60-6
pubmed: 9082986
Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Jun;138:111516
pubmed: 33765583
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):3628-3639
pubmed: 27690296
Cell Immunol. 2018 Aug;330:5-15
pubmed: 29475558
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Nov;8(11):2563-70
pubmed: 20738764
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 06;8(6):e65070
pubmed: 23762286
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;18(1):40-55
pubmed: 32764740
Cell Regen. 2021 Jan 6;10(1):2
pubmed: 33403526
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018 Feb;23(1):44-50
pubmed: 29189411
Scand J Immunol. 2008 May;67(5):453-63
pubmed: 18405323
J Leukoc Biol. 2009 Sep;86(3):513-28
pubmed: 19542050
Biomedicines. 2020 Dec 18;8(12):
pubmed: 33352881
Cell Rep. 2016 May 31;15(9):2000-11
pubmed: 27210762
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;8(8):897-907
pubmed: 24964729
J Hepatol. 2012 Sep;57(3):692-4
pubmed: 22613006
Int J Dev Biol. 2018;62(6-7-8):369-372
pubmed: 29938749
J Immunol. 2014 Jul 1;193(1):344-53
pubmed: 24890723
J Hepatol. 2016 Oct;65(4):758-768
pubmed: 27262757
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Feb;301:64-72
pubmed: 30391304
Biochem Pharmacol. 2013 Sep 15;86(6):836-43
pubmed: 23876342
BMC Immunol. 2018 Jul 9;19(1):23
pubmed: 29986661
Blood. 2011 Jan 27;117(4):1319-28
pubmed: 21098741
FASEB J. 2019 May;33(5):5967-5978
pubmed: 30730772
J Immunol. 2013 Jun 15;190(12):6360-7
pubmed: 23667110
Immunity. 2014 Jul 17;41(1):14-20
pubmed: 25035950
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
Microbes Infect. 2000 Mar;2(3):313-6
pubmed: 10758408
Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;143(7):1741-1752
pubmed: 29667169
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 16;10:834
pubmed: 31040854
Front Immunol. 2021 Jun 09;12:688643
pubmed: 34177942
Cell Death Differ. 2021 May 15;:
pubmed: 33993195
Compr Physiol. 2013 Jan;3(1):485-513
pubmed: 23720294
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0136774
pubmed: 26333171
Nature. 2007 Nov 15;450(7168):435-9
pubmed: 17960135
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):E1463-72
pubmed: 24706780
Cancer Res. 2021 Feb 15;81(4):956-967
pubmed: 33293426
Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:949157
pubmed: 22933833
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 11;10(1):21795
pubmed: 33311558
Int J Mol Med. 2018 Jul;42(1):346-358
pubmed: 29620252
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;10:566511
pubmed: 33194645
Immunity. 2018 Oct 16;49(4):595-613
pubmed: 30332628
Dev Comp Immunol. 2017 Jan;66:98-110
pubmed: 26891614
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015 Jan;35(1):71-83
pubmed: 25149075
Nat Immunol. 2016 Jan;17(1):2-8
pubmed: 26681456
Lab Anim. 2015 Apr;49(1 Suppl):81-8
pubmed: 25835741