Reproductive Performance of Hycole Rabbit Does, Growth of Kits and Milk Chemical Composition during Nine Consecutive Lactations under Extensive Rhythm.

extensive farming kits growth milk rabbits production

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 25 06 2021
revised: 03 08 2021
accepted: 30 08 2021
entrez: 28 9 2021
pubmed: 29 9 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The goal of this study was to analyze the reproductive performance of does, growth of their kits, and chemical composition of their milk over nine consecutive parities in order to indicate the boundary of female reproductive profitability. The novelty of this study results from the combinations of three factors: extensive reproductive rhythm, commercial farming conditions, and a period of nine consecutive parities, showing the actual lifespan of a rabbit doe on commercial farms. The data was collected on 60 Hycole females kept at a commercial rabbit farm. Throughout the study, 32 does were excluded due to different reasons (e.g., excluded by means of selection-43.8% and mortalities-25.0%). The does were first inseminated at 28 weeks of age. Following artificial inseminations were conducted 14-15 days after each parturition. All kits were weaned at the age of 35 days. The following characteristics were analysed: body weight of rabbit does at artificial insemination, milk production per lactation, litter size, litter weight, average kit weight, and milk chemical composition. Rabbit does had a significant decrease in kindling rate between the eighth and the ninth parity (by 10.0 percentage points;

Identifiants

pubmed: 34573574
pii: ani11092608
doi: 10.3390/ani11092608
pmc: PMC8466940
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Animal. 2014 Jul;8(7):1146-52
pubmed: 26263030
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jun;93(1-2):1-15
pubmed: 16054785
Lab Anim. 1976 Jul;10(3):203-7
pubmed: 966692
J Anim Sci. 1995 Apr;73(4):1131-7
pubmed: 7628957
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jul;93(3-4):218-30
pubmed: 16165333
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Feb 1;88(2):120-7
pubmed: 18842309
Br J Nutr. 1964;18:583-6
pubmed: 14234545
Prev Vet Med. 2016 May 1;127:56-63
pubmed: 27094141
J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(11):6863-6869
pubmed: 24054296
J Anim Sci. 1999 Feb;77(2):416-26
pubmed: 10100671
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 28;10(2):
pubmed: 32012962
Animal. 2020 Jun;14(6):1111-1119
pubmed: 31964447

Auteurs

Agnieszka Ludwiczak (A)

Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Słoneczna 1, 62-002 Suchy Las, Poland.

Joanna Składanowska-Baryza (J)

Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Słoneczna 1, 62-002 Suchy Las, Poland.

Beata Kuczyńska (B)

Animal Breeding Department, Faculty of Animal Breeding, Bioengineering and Conservation, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.

Ewa Sell-Kubiak (E)

Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.

Marek Stanisz (M)

Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Słoneczna 1, 62-002 Suchy Las, Poland.

Classifications MeSH