The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour.

animal welfare bovids buffaloes cattle donkeys draught animals equids greenhouse gas emission horses rural activities

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 14 07 2021
revised: 31 08 2021
accepted: 10 09 2021
entrez: 28 9 2021
pubmed: 29 9 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study discusses scientific findings on the use of draught animals such as equids (i.e., horses, mules, and donkeys) and bovids (i.e., cattle and water buffaloes) in rural labours. Relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 1980 and 2021 was retrieved from CAB Abstracts, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. Although animals were used to produce draught power since their domestication and are still being used for this purpose, mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture. However, the process was uneven across continents according to economic constraints, and draught animals are currently concentrated in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Generally, equids can work at rates similar to those of bovids or faster but can sustain the work for shorter periods of time. In addition, buffaloes possess tough hooves and resistance to disease that make them suitable for working in wetlands and clay soils. Draught animals allow a marked reduction of both GHG emissions and non-renewable energy consumption as compared with agricultural machinery. In addition, they may allow obtaining profits from otherwise non-usable lands. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural areas where low investments are usually the only ones feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. However, more attention should be paid to the quality of human-animal interactions-due to the close contact between animals and humans while working-and to the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered-due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34573649
pii: ani11092683
doi: 10.3390/ani11092683
pmc: PMC8471664
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Vet World. 2018 Sep;11(9):1298-1306
pubmed: 30410237
Proc Nutr Soc. 1994 Mar;53(1):169-79
pubmed: 8029226
Aust J Biol Sci. 1987;40(2):221-34
pubmed: 3662970
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jan 30;9(2):
pubmed: 30704022
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2005 Oct;37(7):589-97
pubmed: 16450864
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jun;43(5):923-8
pubmed: 21240550
Equine Vet J. 2006 Sep;38(5):433-8
pubmed: 16986604
Meat Sci. 2008 Sep;80(1):2-11
pubmed: 22063164
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1998 Oct;30(5):309-24
pubmed: 9881437
Equine Vet J. 1985 Sep;17(5):386-90
pubmed: 4054090
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;10(3):
pubmed: 32204467
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2002 Mar;34(2):169-79
pubmed: 11969114
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014 Jan;46(1):145-51
pubmed: 24022833
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan 30;144(3-4):60-71
pubmed: 24378117
Br J Nutr. 2006 Jan;95(1):88-98
pubmed: 16441920
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1998 Feb;30(1):67-78
pubmed: 9719832
Theriogenology. 1993 Sep;40(3):571-84
pubmed: 16727340
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):265-83
pubmed: 15907574
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1989 Nov;21(4):273-6
pubmed: 2617684
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2005 Nov;37 Suppl 1:1-19
pubmed: 16335068
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;28(3):451-5
pubmed: 25656203
Vet Rec. 2010 Sep 11;167(11):415-9
pubmed: 20834002
J Nutr. 1994 Dec;124(12 Suppl):2723S-2729S
pubmed: 7996280

Auteurs

Daniel Mota-Rojas (D)

Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Campus Xochimilco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México City 04960, Mexico.

Ada Braghieri (A)

Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, PZ, Italy.

Adolfo Álvarez-Macías (A)

Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Campus Xochimilco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México City 04960, Mexico.

Francesco Serrapica (F)

Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy.

Efrén Ramírez-Bribiesca (E)

Livestock Program, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco 56230, Mexico.

Rosy Cruz-Monterrosa (R)

Food Science Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Unidad Lerma, Lerma 52172, Mexico.

Felicia Masucci (F)

Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy.

Patricia Mora-Medina (P)

Livestock Department, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), FESC, Mexico City 54715, Mexico.

Fabio Napolitano (F)

Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, PZ, Italy.

Classifications MeSH