Classification of Cardiomyopathies from MR Cine Images Using Convolutional Neural Network with Transfer Learning.
Grad-CAM
cardiomyopathy
convolutional neural network
deep learning
transfer learning
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2021
27 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
revised:
20
08
2021
accepted:
24
08
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The automatic classification of various types of cardiomyopathies is desirable but has never been performed using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The purpose of this study was to evaluate currently available CNN models to classify cine magnetic resonance (cine-MR) images of cardiomyopathies. Diastolic and systolic frames of 1200 cine-MR sequences of three categories of subjects (395 normal, 411 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 394 dilated cardiomyopathy) were selected, preprocessed, and labeled. Pretrained, fine-tuned deep learning models (VGG) were used for image classification (sixfold cross-validation and double split testing with hold-out data). The heat activation map algorithm (Grad-CAM) was applied to reveal salient pixel areas leading to the classification. The diastolic-systolic dual-input concatenated VGG model cross-validation accuracy was 0.982 ± 0.009. Summed confusion matrices showed that, for the 1200 inputs, the VGG model led to 22 errors. The classification of a 227-input validation group, carried out by an experienced radiologist and cardiologist, led to a similar number of discrepancies. The image preparation process led to 5% accuracy improvement as compared to nonprepared images. Grad-CAM heat activation maps showed that most misclassifications occurred when extracardiac location caught the attention of the network. CNN networks are very well suited and are 98% accurate for the classification of cardiomyopathies, regardless of the imaging plane, when both diastolic and systolic frames are incorporated. Misclassification is in the same range as inter-observer discrepancies in experienced human readers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34573896
pii: diagnostics11091554
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091554
pmc: PMC8470356
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : ANR
ID : ANR-10-IAHU-02
Références
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1839
pubmed: 33469077
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jul;92:78-83
pubmed: 28624024
Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020). 2020 Apr;2020:151-159
pubmed: 33196064
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Oct;1(6):e271-e297
pubmed: 33323251
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1180-1193
pubmed: 28982571
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Aug;111:103356
pubmed: 31323604
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 1):1549-1565
pubmed: 31395244
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1654-1663
pubmed: 29550305
Med Image Anal. 2019 Aug;56:80-95
pubmed: 31200290
Circulation. 2018 Oct 16;138(16):1623-1635
pubmed: 30354459
Circulation. 2011 Dec 13;124(24):e783-831
pubmed: 22068434
Br J Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;93(1113):20190812
pubmed: 32017605
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Apr 03;9(2):
pubmed: 30987172
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Oct 18;1:59
pubmed: 31304338
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Oct;12(10):1946-1954
pubmed: 30660549
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 05;7:25
pubmed: 32195270
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Dec 7;22(1):84
pubmed: 33287829
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):3931-3940
pubmed: 33241513
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Dec 14;22(1):87
pubmed: 33308262
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1038-45
pubmed: 24817313
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jan 24;7:1
pubmed: 32039241
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jul;48(1):140-152
pubmed: 29316024
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jan;104:81-86
pubmed: 30447397
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12246
pubmed: 30212958