Spontaneous Upper Urinary Tract Rupture Caused by Ureteric Stones: Clinical Characteristics and Validation of a Radiological Classification System.
classification system
emergency
radiology
spontaneous upper urinary tract rupture
ureteric stones
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2021
29 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
30
07
2021
revised:
26
08
2021
accepted:
27
08
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study seeks to validate a radiological classification system of spontaneous upper urinary tract rupture (sUUTR) and to analyse its relationship with clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics of sUUTR. We analysed data from 66 patients with a computerised tomography (CT)-proven sUUTR treated with ureteral or nephrostomy catheter positioning. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). All CT scans were reviewed by two experienced radiologists and one urologist, who classified sUUTR in (a) local spread, (b) free fluid and (c) urinoma. Interobserver agreement for radiological score was evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's Kappa analyses. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models verified the association between clinical variables and sUUTR severity. The interobserver agreement for sUUTR classification was high among radiologists and between the radiologists and the urologist (all Kappa > 0.7), with an overall high interrater reliability (ICC 0.82). Local spread, free fluid and urinoma were found in 24 (36.4%), 39 (59.1%) and 3 (4.5%) cases, respectively. Patients with free fluid/urinoma had higher rate of CCI ≥ 1 than those with local spread (40.5% vs. 16.7%, The analysed sUUTR classification score had good inter/intra-reader reliability among radiologists and urologists. Absence of urine extravasation was five times more frequent in patients with local spread, making conservative treatment feasible in these cases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study seeks to validate a radiological classification system of spontaneous upper urinary tract rupture (sUUTR) and to analyse its relationship with clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics of sUUTR.
METHODS
METHODS
We analysed data from 66 patients with a computerised tomography (CT)-proven sUUTR treated with ureteral or nephrostomy catheter positioning. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). All CT scans were reviewed by two experienced radiologists and one urologist, who classified sUUTR in (a) local spread, (b) free fluid and (c) urinoma. Interobserver agreement for radiological score was evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's Kappa analyses. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models verified the association between clinical variables and sUUTR severity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The interobserver agreement for sUUTR classification was high among radiologists and between the radiologists and the urologist (all Kappa > 0.7), with an overall high interrater reliability (ICC 0.82). Local spread, free fluid and urinoma were found in 24 (36.4%), 39 (59.1%) and 3 (4.5%) cases, respectively. Patients with free fluid/urinoma had higher rate of CCI ≥ 1 than those with local spread (40.5% vs. 16.7%,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The analysed sUUTR classification score had good inter/intra-reader reliability among radiologists and urologists. Absence of urine extravasation was five times more frequent in patients with local spread, making conservative treatment feasible in these cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34573910
pii: diagnostics11091568
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091568
pmc: PMC8471042
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Am J Perinatol. 2002 May;19(4):189-95
pubmed: 12012280
J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):488-9
pubmed: 22281035
Int J Urol. 2004 Dec;11(12):1058-64
pubmed: 15663675
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;32(7):772-4
pubmed: 24768334
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1332-4
pubmed: 18971042
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):363-70
pubmed: 10915676
BMC Urol. 2016 Jul 07;16(1):37
pubmed: 27388295
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966 Sep;98(1):27-40
pubmed: 5913699
Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(6):478-80
pubmed: 8255658
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Jul;72(6):590-595
pubmed: 31274124
J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):479-84
pubmed: 18298313
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):915-8
pubmed: 18958484
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Case Rep Urol. 2013;2013:932529
pubmed: 24195004
Case Rep Radiol. 2013;2013:851859
pubmed: 24455381
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9190
pubmed: 29390332
Abdom Imaging. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):88-92
pubmed: 11740616
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1909-11; discussion 1912
pubmed: 21736690
Int Urol Nephrol. 1992;24(5):465-9
pubmed: 1459823