Predict Treatment Response by Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging: A Preliminary Study on 46 Meningiomas Treated with Proton-Therapy.
apparent diffusion coefficient
diffusion-weighted imaging
magnetic resonance imaging
meningiomas
proton therapy
treatment response
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2021
15 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
19
08
2021
revised:
10
09
2021
accepted:
10
09
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
a considerable subgroup of meningiomas (MN) exhibit indolent and insidious growth. Strategies to detect earlier treatment responses based on tumour biology rather than on size can be useful. We aimed to characterize therapy-induced changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of MN treated with proton-therapy (PT), determining whether the pre- and early post-treatment ADC values may predict tumour response. Forty-four subjects with MN treated with PT were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at baseline and each 3 months for a follow-up period up to 36 months after the beginning of PT. Mean relative ADC (rADCm) values of 46 MN were measured at each exam. The volume variation percentage (VV) for each MN was calculated. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess the differences in rADCm values between pre-treatment and post-treatment exams. Patients were grouped in terms of VV (threshold -20%). A A significant progressive increase of rADCm values was detected at each time point when compared to baseline rADCm ( In MN treated with PT, pre-treatment rADCm values and longitudinal rADCm changes may predict treatment response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34574025
pii: diagnostics11091684
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091684
pmc: PMC8469991
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Feb 17;66(4):04NT02
pubmed: 33429381
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 23;11(2):
pubmed: 30678055
Cancers (Basel). 2015 Feb 12;7(1):353-81
pubmed: 25686476
Biomedicines. 2021 Mar 21;9(3):
pubmed: 33801089
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2019 Dec;33(6):989-1009
pubmed: 31668216
Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):170-8
pubmed: 20019139
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Sep;46(3):850-860
pubmed: 28152251
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):26-36
pubmed: 30137421
Cancer Med. 2015 Jul;4(7):1101-16
pubmed: 25919147
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):306-314
pubmed: 26905869
Cancer Imaging. 2010 Oct 04;10 Spec no A:S179-88
pubmed: 20880779
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 May;19(5):546-54
pubmed: 15112303
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jul;32(1):2-16
pubmed: 20575076
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 14;21(Suppl 1):i18-i31
pubmed: 30649489
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2001;18(2):61-6
pubmed: 11908875
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr;188(4):1001-8
pubmed: 17377036
J Neurooncol. 2015 May;123(1):123-8
pubmed: 25859843
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2389-95
pubmed: 21723681
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Jan 1;311:288-294
pubmed: 30408557
Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;169:205-227
pubmed: 32553291
Radiol Med. 2017 Feb;122(2):131-139
pubmed: 27752969
Clin Radiol. 2009 Nov;64(11):1067-74
pubmed: 19822239
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Sep;51:158-162
pubmed: 29782920
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jul;63(7):1053-1060
pubmed: 33392736
Int J Part Ther. 2017 Winter;3(3):414-420
pubmed: 31772991
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;19(1):181-209
pubmed: 21129641
Neuroradiology. 2006 Aug;48(8):513-20
pubmed: 16786348
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Oct 14;4:42
pubmed: 19828022
Oncotarget. 2017 May 10;8(35):59492-59499
pubmed: 28938652
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1200-1205
pubmed: 28408629
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):894-900
pubmed: 18710982
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):985-91
pubmed: 15833979
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1471-9
pubmed: 25880014
Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):307-8
pubmed: 12147376