The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance.
gender
job satisfaction
mediation
moderation
organizational citizenship behavior
path analysis
task performance
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 09 2021
09 09 2021
Historique:
received:
15
07
2021
revised:
30
08
2021
accepted:
06
09
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Job satisfaction (JS) is an indicator of individual psychosocial health. Consistent evidence showed that voluntary extra-role behavior in organizations, namely organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), can also contribute to individual psychological health. JS has been found to positively influence employees' OCB, and both JS and OCB have been found to predict employees' task performance (TP). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether employees' OCB mediates the relationship of JS with TP, taking into consideration gender as a potential moderator, and other sociodemographic and work-related characteristics as confounding variables. A total of 518 employees, 54.6% women, aged 19-66 years with a mean age of about 36 years, completed measures of JS, OCB, and TP. Results showed a partial mediation of OCB in the JS-TP relationship, which was invariant across gender. A potential practical implication of findings is that human resource managers and practitioners might ultimately benefit male and female employees' well-being as well as the organizations' productivity by developing targeted individual- and group-level trainings and interventions to enhance JS and OCB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34574423
pii: ijerph18189499
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189499
pmc: PMC8469399
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):132-46
pubmed: 15641894
J Appl Psychol. 1998 Apr;83(2):247-60
pubmed: 9577234
Front Psychol. 2017 May 11;8:747
pubmed: 28553248
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:279-307
pubmed: 11752487
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 04;11:564112
pubmed: 33613349
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Nov;105(11):1338-1350
pubmed: 32118460
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):52-65
pubmed: 11916216
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):122-41
pubmed: 19186900
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66
pubmed: 11148302
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jun;199(6):394-7
pubmed: 21629018
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):105-12
pubmed: 15657192
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 24;11:758
pubmed: 32390915
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 10;18(2):
pubmed: 33435183
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):590-8
pubmed: 12090617
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):392-423
pubmed: 18361640
Work. 2014;48(2):229-38
pubmed: 23803443
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):472-81
pubmed: 18361647
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jun;105(6):637-670
pubmed: 31647249
Psychol Bull. 2001 May;127(3):376-407
pubmed: 11393302
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(2):160-75
pubmed: 24950534
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):66-80
pubmed: 11916217