A Qualitative Study on Nudging and Palliative Care: "An Attractive but Misleading Concept".
ethics
nudging
oncology
palliative care
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 09 2021
11 09 2021
Historique:
received:
04
08
2021
revised:
06
09
2021
accepted:
08
09
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The debate about the ethical decision-making process in the healthcare context has been enriched with a theory called "nudging", which has been defined as the framing of information that can significantly influence behaviour without restricting choice. The literature shows very limited data on the opinion and experience of palliative care healthcare professionals on the use of nudging techniques in their care setting. The aim of this study is to explore the beliefs of experienced palliative care professionals towards nudging. We performed a qualitative study using textual data collected through a focus group. It was audio-recorded, and the transcripts were subjected to a thematic analysis. It was performed within an oncological research hospital with a small and multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals specialised in PC. Participants reported two overarching positions grounded in two main themes: (1) translating nudging in the PC setting and (2) towards a neutral space. The participants found few justifications for the use of nudging in the PC field, even if it can be very attractive and reassuring. Participants also expressed concerns about the excessive risk of developing pure paternalism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34574501
pii: ijerph18189575
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189575
pmc: PMC8468152
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):832
pubmed: 27281629
Bioethics. 2016 Oct;30(8):601-8
pubmed: 27411164
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 25;19(1):149
pubmed: 32977796
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(6):16-7
pubmed: 23641838
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Dec;108(12):508-510
pubmed: 29297900
Am J Bioeth. 2016 Jul;16(7):24-5
pubmed: 27292843
Nurs Philos. 2009 Oct;10(4):231-40
pubmed: 19743967
J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):415-20
pubmed: 24588626
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):429-30
pubmed: 26914544
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):544-551
pubmed: 29094668
Cancer. 2013 Jun 1;119(11):2067-73
pubmed: 23564395
CMAJ. 1993 Mar 15;148(6):1037-43
pubmed: 8448693
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1421-2
pubmed: 25871666
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Winter;4(1):44-55
pubmed: 7627365
Bioethics. 2018 Mar;32(3):164-170
pubmed: 29283190
Gerontology. 2020;66(5):427-430
pubmed: 32516766
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e15-e17
pubmed: 32240752
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Mar;47(2):38-40
pubmed: 28301707
Urology. 1989 May;33(5 Suppl):57-62
pubmed: 2523612
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Mar-Apr;36(2):38-45
pubmed: 16604897
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Nov-Dec;40(6):462-465
pubmed: 27919153
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Mar;48(2):33-39
pubmed: 29590519
J Med Philos. 1996 Feb;21(1):7-39
pubmed: 8740882