Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing.

EBM Ti-6Al-4V fatigue fluidized bed laser finishing surface roughness

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 29 08 2021
revised: 10 09 2021
accepted: 14 09 2021
entrez: 28 9 2021
pubmed: 29 9 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-alloy components for aerospace and medical industries; however, the main weakness of structural parts is the fatigue life, which is affected by surface quality, meaning the micro-cracking of small surface defects induced by the manufacturing process. Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Bed are proposed by the authors since they represent cost-effective and environment-friendly alternatives for automated surface finishing. A comparison between these two finishing technologies was established and discussed. Experimental tests investigated both mechanical properties and fatigue performances. The tests also focused on understanding the basic mechanisms involved in fatigue failures of machined Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated via Electron Beam Melting and the effects of operational parameters. X-ray tomography was used to evaluate the internal porosity to better explain the fatigue behaviour. The results demonstrated the capability of Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Beds to improve failure performances. Life Cycle Analysis was additionally performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technologies in terms of environmental impact and resource consumption.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34576590
pii: ma14185366
doi: 10.3390/ma14185366
pmc: PMC8464882
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Materials (Basel). 2011 Oct 10;4(10):1776-1792
pubmed: 28824107
MethodsX. 2018 Sep 15;5:1102-1110
pubmed: 30271722
Materials (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;12(24):
pubmed: 31835783
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 06;13(13):
pubmed: 32640599

Auteurs

Eleonora Atzeni (E)

Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.

Silvio Genna (S)

Department of Enterprise Engineering, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Roma, Italy.

Erica Menna (E)

Department of Enterprise Engineering, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Roma, Italy.

Gianluca Rubino (G)

Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, Largo dell'Università, Università della Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.

Alessandro Salmi (A)

Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.

Federica Trovalusci (F)

Department of Enterprise Engineering, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Roma, Italy.

Classifications MeSH