Comparative Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine with Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
BNT162b2 vaccine
COVID-19
anti-RBD
health care workers
immune response
Journal
Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2021
13 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
12
08
2021
revised:
31
08
2021
accepted:
07
09
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BNT162b2 has proven to be highly effective, but there is a paucity of data regarding immunogenicity factors and comparison between response to vaccination and natural infection. This study included 871 vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW) and 181 patients with natural infection. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring anti-SARS-CoV-2 against the RBD domain of the spike protein (anti-RBD). Samples were collected 1-2 weeks after vaccination or 15-59 days post-onset of symptoms. Post-vaccine anti-RBD concentrations were associated with age, gender, vaccination side-effects (VSE) and prior infection (Pr-CoV). Anti-RBD median levels (95%CI) were lower by 2466 (651-5583), 6228 (3254-9203) and 7651 (4479-10,823) AU/mL in 35-44, 45-54, 55-70 yrs, respectively, compared with the 18-34 yrs group. In females, the median levels were higher by 2823 (859-4787), 5024 (3122-6926) in individuals with VSE, and 9971 (5158-14,783) AU/mL in HCWs with Pr-CoV. The ratio of anti-RBD in vaccinated individuals versus those with natural infection varied from 1.0 to 19.4. The high immunogenicity of BNT162b2 is verified, although its sustainability has yet to be elucidated. The use of comparative data from natural infection serological panels, expressing the clinical heterogeneity of natural infection, may facilitate early decisions for candidate vaccines to be evaluated in clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34579254
pii: vaccines9091017
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9091017
pmc: PMC8471735
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040
pubmed: 34588689
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7872):417-422
pubmed: 34192737
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1544-1555
pubmed: 32722908
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1920-1931
pubmed: 32663912
Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb;26(6):
pubmed: 33573712
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):981-984
pubmed: 33795870
Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1459-1469
pubmed: 33844963
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Apr 09;59(8):1453-1462
pubmed: 33837679
Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2913-2915
pubmed: 33864722
Science. 2021 Sep 17;373(6561):eabj0299
pubmed: 34529476
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):181-192
pubmed: 33217362
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4704
pubmed: 32943637
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7868):572-577
pubmed: 34044428
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):187-189
pubmed: 33951357
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):301-308
pubmed: 33501951
J Clin Virol. 2020 Sep;130:104572
pubmed: 32769024
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0024721
pubmed: 34190591
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11):
pubmed: 32826322
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jul;9(7):712-720
pubmed: 33865504
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):616-622
pubmed: 33567448
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):276-280
pubmed: 34237773
Science. 2020 Dec 4;370(6521):1227-1230
pubmed: 33115920
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2320-2332
pubmed: 32877576
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2427-2438
pubmed: 32991794
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):583-588
pubmed: 32731257
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7864):483
pubmed: 34145413
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):585-594
pubmed: 34289274
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):812-817
pubmed: 32434946
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):63
pubmed: 33397909
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Sep;133(17-18):931-941
pubmed: 34378087
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244126
pubmed: 33382764
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Feb 2;6(1):48
pubmed: 33531462