Outcomes After Operative Fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic trauma
ISSN: 1531-2291
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Trauma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8807705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2022
01 05 2022
Historique:
accepted:
20
09
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
25
5
2022
entrez:
28
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture in the setting of total hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing. Although the traditional dogma is that loose femoral components must be revised, we propose that in a frail geriatric population, anatomic reduction and fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fracture variants can restore stem stability and provide similar outcomes as revision arthroplasty. Retrospective cohort study. Level 1 trauma center, tertiary academic medical center. We identified 94 patients over 65 years of age with Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures sustained between 2005 and 2019. Patients were treated by either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty (RA) with or without fixation. Outcomes were mortality, time to full weight-bearing after surgery, intraoperative estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, reoperation, subsidence rate, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain and physical function scores. A total of 75 (79.8%) ORIF and 19 (20.2%) RA patients were reviewed. One-year mortality for our cohort was 26.3%, and there was no significant difference between groups. Mean time to weight bear and surgical complication rates were similar between groups. The ORIF group had a significantly shorter time to surgery than the RA group. The RA group had greater incidence and amount of subsidence as well as estimated blood loss than the ORIF group. In geriatric patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 type periprosthetic fractures with known loose stems, ORIF may offer a similarly safe method of treatment than revision arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34581700
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002277
pii: 00005131-202205000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
228-233Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflict of interest..
Références
Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regnér H, et al. Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1215–1222.
Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38:651–654.
Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:S66–S70.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.
Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:1076–1081.
Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:857–865.
Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Classification of the hip. Orthopedic Clinics North America. 1999;30:215–220.
Duncan C. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 1995;44:293–304.
Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, et al. The reliability of validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:59–62.
Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1576–1579.
Lindahl H, Malchau H, Odén A, et al. Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:26–30.
Niikura T, Lee SY, Sakai Y, et al. Treatment results of a periprosthetic femoral fracture case series: treatment method for Vancouver type b2 fractures can be customized. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:138–145.
Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J, et al. Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop. 2016;13:322–326.
Smitham PJ, Carbone TA, Bolam SM, et al. Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1430–1434.
Joestl J, Hofbauer M, Lang N, et al. Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2016;47:939–943.
Flury A, Hasler J, Pagenstert G, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem's design. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;141:871–878.
Gitajn IL, Heng M, Weaver MJ, et al. Mortality following surgical management of Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:9–14.
Stenvers E, Mars RC, Zuurmond RG. Frail patients benefit from less invasive procedures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10:2151459319885283.
Egol KA, Strauss EJ. Perioperative considerations in geriatric patients with hip fracture: what is the evidence? J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:386–394.
Ottesen TD, McLynn RP, Galivanche AR, et al. Increased complications in geriatric patients with a fracture of the hip whose postoperative weight-bearing is restricted: an analysis of 4918 patients. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:1377–1384.
Baum C, Leimbacher M, Kriechling P, et al. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures vancouver type B2: revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019;10:2151459319876859.
Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients. Injury. 2007;38:725–733.
Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR, Loftus T, et al. Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2240–2245.
Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, et al. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:17–25.
Moreta J, Uriarte I, Ormaza A, et al. Outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. Hip Int. 2019;29:184–190.
Bulatović N, Kezunović M, Vučetić Č, et al. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty Vancouver type B. Acta Clin Croat. 2017;56:536–543.
Lyons RF, Piggott RP, Curtin W, et al. Periprosthetic hip fractures: a review of the economic burden based on length of stay. J Orthop. 2018;15:118–121.
Shields E, Behrend C, Bair J, et al. Mortality and financial burden of periprosthetic fractures of the femur. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2014;5:147–153.
Benetos IS, Babis GC, Zoubos AB, et al. Factors affecting the risk of hip fractures. Injury. 2007;38:735–744.
Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, et al. Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury. 2008;39:1157–1163.
Khan SK, Kalra S, Khanna A, et al. Timing of surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients. Injury. 2009;40:692–697.
Bottle A, Aylin P. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ. 2006;332:947–951.
Griffiths EJ, Cash DJ, Kalra S, et al. Time to surgery and 30-day morbidity and mortality of periprosthetic hip fractures. Injury. 2013;44:1949–1952.
Deshmukh S, Omar IM. Imaging of hip arthroplasties: normal findings and hardware complications. Seminar Musculoskel Radiol. 2019;23:162–176.
Fritz J, Lurie B, Miller TT. Imaging of hip arthroplasty. Seminar Musculoskel Radiol. 2013;17:316–327.
Drexler M, Dwyer T, Chakravertty R, et al. The outcome of modified extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1598–1604.
Walker PS, Mai SF, Cobb AG, et al. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. A study of cemented Charnley and Stanmore femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:705–714.
Schreiner AJ, Steidle C, Schmidutz F, et al. Hip revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic fractures vancouver B2 and B3 with a modular revision stem: short-term results and review of literature. Z Orthop Unfall. 2020. doi: 10.1055/a-1209-4002 [epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.1055/a-1209-4002