Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Office Laryngoscopy: A Scoping Review.
Laryngology
artificial intelligence
laryngoscopy
scoping review
Journal
The Laryngoscope
ISSN: 1531-4995
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8607378
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
revised:
15
09
2021
received:
03
07
2021
accepted:
17
09
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
14
9
2022
entrez:
28
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This scoping review aims to provide a broad overview of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to office laryngoscopy to identify gaps in knowledge and guide future research. Scoping Review. Searches for studies on AI and office laryngoscopy were conducted in five databases. Title and abstract and then full-text screening were performed. Primary research studies published in English of any date were included. Studies were summarized by: AI applications, targeted conditions, imaging modalities, author affiliations, and dataset characteristics. Studies focused on vocal fold vibration analysis (43%), lesion recognition (24%), and vocal fold movement determination (19%). The most frequently automated tasks were recognition of vocal fold nodules (19%), polyp (14%), paralysis (11%), paresis (8%), and cyst (7%). Imaging modalities included high-speed laryngeal videos (45%), stroboscopy (29%), and narrow band imaging endoscopy (7%). The body of literature was primarily authored by science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) specialists (76%) with only 30 studies (31%) involving co-authorship by STEM specialists and otolaryngologists. Datasets were mostly from single institution (84%) and most commonly originated from Germany (23%), USA (16%), Spain (9%), Italy (8%), and China (8%). Demographic information was only reported in 39 studies (40%), with age and sex being the most commonly reported, whereas race/ethnicity and gender were not reported in any studies. More interdisciplinary collaboration between STEM and otolaryngology research teams improved demographic reporting especially of race and ethnicity to ensure broad representation, and larger and more geographically diverse datasets will be crucial to future research on AI in office laryngoscopy. NA Laryngoscope, 132:1993-2016, 2022.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1993-2016Informations de copyright
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Références
Artificial intelligence - Oxford Reference. Available at: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095426960. Accessed March 5, 2021.
Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med 2019;25:24-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z.
Crowson MG, Ranisau J, Eskander A, et al. A contemporary review of machine learning in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2020;130:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27850.
Paderno A, Holsinger FC, Piazza C. Videomics: bringing deep learning to diagnostic endoscopy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;29:143-148. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000697.
FDA FDA authorizes marketing of first device that uses artificial intelligence to help detect potential signs of colon cancer|FDA Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-marketing-first-device-uses-artificial-intelligence-help-detect-potential-signs-colon. Accessed June 20, 2021.
Xiong H, Lin P, Yu JG, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of laryngeal cancer via deep learning based on laryngoscopic images. EBioMedicine 2019;48:92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.075.
Moccia S, Vanone GO, De Momi E, et al. Learning-based classification of informative laryngoscopic frames. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2018;158:21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.030.
Ta NH. ENT in the context of global health. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019;101:93-96. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0138.
Vickery TW, Weterings R, Cabrera-Muffly C. Geographic distribution of otolaryngologists in the United States. Ear Nose Throat J 2016;95:218-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131609500607.
Hughes CA, McMenamin P, Mehta V, Pillsbury H, Kennedy D. Otolaryngology workforce analysis. Laryngoscope 2016;126:S5-S11. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26238.
Fagan JJ, Jacobs M. Survey of ENT services in Africa: need for a comprehensive intervention. Glob Health Action 2009;2:1-7. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v2i0.1932.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
Lohscheller J, Toy H, Rosanowski F, Eysholdt U, Döllinger M. Clinically evaluated procedure for the reconstruction of vocal fold vibrations from endoscopic digital high-speed videos. Med Image Anal 2007;11:400-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2007.04.005.
Ren J, Jing X, Wang J, et al. Automatic recognition of laryngoscopic images using a deep-learning technique. Laryngoscope 2020;130:E686-E693. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28539.
Adamian N, Naunheim MR, Jowett N. An open-source computer vision tool for automated vocal fold tracking from videoendoscopy. Laryngoscope 2020;131:E219-E225. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28669.
Gomez P, Semmler M, Schuetzenberger A, Bohr C, Doellinger M. Low-light image enhancement of high-speed endoscopic videos using a convolutional neural network. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019;57:1451-1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-01965-4.
Gomez P, Kist AM, Schlegel P, et al. BAGLS, a multihospital benchmark for automatic glottis segmentation. Sci Data 2020;7:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0526-3.
Caliskan A, Bryson JJ, Narayanan A. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 2017;356:183-186. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1053.
Zou J, Schiebinger L. Design AI so that its fair. Nature 2018;559:324-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8.
Larrazabal AJ, Nieto N, Peterson V, Milone DH, Ferrante E. Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117:12592-12594. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919012117.
Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future-big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1216-1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1606181.
Wang F, Casalino LP, Khullar D. Deep learning in medicine - promise, Progress, and challenges. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:293-294. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7117.
Blasimme A, Fadda M, Schneider M, Vayena E. Data sharing for precision medicine: policy lessons and future directions. Health Aff 2018;37:702-709. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1558.
Gómez P, Kist AM, Schlegel P, et al. BAGLS, a multihospital benchmark for automatic glottis segmentation. Sci Data 2020;7:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0526-3.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 2016;316:2402-2410. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017;542:115-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056.
Galdran A, Costa P, Campilho A. Real-time informative laryngoscopic frame classification with pre-trained convolutional neural networks. Paper presented at: Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. Vol 2019-April. IEEE Computer Society; 2019:87-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759511
Shankar S, Halpern Y, Breck E, Atwood J, Wilson J, Sculley D. No classification without representation: assessing Geodiversity issues in open data sets for the developing world. arXiv 2017; Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.08536. Accessed February 25, 2021.
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE Digital Image Processing. 2017.