Analysis of the baseline performance of five UK lung cancer screening programmes.


Journal

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-8332
Titre abrégé: Lung Cancer
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8800805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 27 05 2021
revised: 26 08 2021
accepted: 14 09 2021
pubmed: 29 9 2021
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 28 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Low-dose CT (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer specific mortality. Several countries, including the UK, are evaluating the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of LDCT screening using the latest evidence. In this paper we report baseline screening performance from five UK-based lung cancer screening programmes. Data was collected at baseline from each screening programme. Measures of performance included prevalence of screen detected lung cancer, rate of surveillance imaging for indeterminate findings and surgical resection rates. Screening related harms were assessed by measuring false positive rates, number of invasive tests with associated complications in individuals without lung cancer and benign surgical resection rates. A total of 11,148 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan during the period of analysis (2011 to 2020). Overall, 84.7% (n = 9,440) of baseline LDCT scans were categorised as negative, 11.1% (n = 1,239) as indeterminate and 4.2% (n = 469) as positive. The prevalence of screen detected lung cancer was 2.2%, ranging between 1.8% and 4.4% for individual programmes. The surgical resection rate was 66% (range 46% to 83%) and post-surgical 90-day mortality for those with lung cancer 1.2% (n = 2/165). The false positive rate was 2% (n = 219/10,898) and of those with a positive result, one in two had lung cancer diagnosed (53.3%). An invasive test was required in 0.6% (n = 61/10,898) of screening attendees without lung cancer; there were no associated major complications or deaths. The benign surgical resection rate was 4.6% (n = 8/173), equating to 0.07% of the screened population. The performance of UK-based lung cancer screening programmes, delivered within or aligned to the National Health Service, compares favourably to published clinical trial data. Reported harms, including false positive and benign surgical resection rates are low. Ongoing monitoring of screening performance is vital to ensure standards are maintained and harms minimised.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34583222
pii: S0169-5002(21)00548-1
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

136-140

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Haval Balata (H)

Manchester Thoracic Oncology Centre (MTOC), Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: haval.balata@mft.nhs.uk.

Mamta Ruparel (M)

Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.

Emma O'Dowd (E)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

Martin Ledson (M)

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

John K Field (JK)

Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Stephen W Duffy (SW)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Samantha L Quaife (SL)

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Anna Sharman (A)

Manchester Thoracic Oncology Centre (MTOC), Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Sam Janes (S)

Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.

David Baldwin (D)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

Richard Booton (R)

Manchester Thoracic Oncology Centre (MTOC), Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Philip A J Crosbie (PAJ)

Manchester Thoracic Oncology Centre (MTOC), Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH