Perception of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Personnel on Society Recommendations on Personal Protective Equipment, Case Selection, and Scope Cleaning During Covid-19 Pandemic: An International Survey Study.
COVID-19
Endoscopy
Guidelines
Recommendations
Survey
Journal
Clinical endoscopy
ISSN: 2234-2400
Titre abrégé: Clin Endosc
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101576886
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2021
accepted:
27
02
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
28
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Thai Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published recommendations on safe endoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the practicality and applicability of the recommendations and the perceptions of endoscopy personnel on them. A validated questionnaire was sent to 1290 endoscopy personnel globally. Of these, the data of all 330 responders (25.6%) from 15 countries, related to the current recommendations on proper personal protective equipment (PPE), case selection, scope cleaning, and safety perception, were analyzed. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between the variables. Despite an overwhelming agreement with the recommendations on PPE (94.5%) and case selection (95.5%), their practicality and applicability on PPE recommendations and case selection were significantly lower (p=0.001, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.032, respectively). Factors that were associated with lower sense of safety in endoscopy units were younger age (p=0.004), less working experience (p=0.008), in-training status (p=0.04), and higher national prevalence of COVID-19 (p=0.003). High prevalent countries also had more difficulty implementing the guidelines (p<0.001) and they considered the PPE recommendations less practical and showed lower agreement with them (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). A higher number of in-hospital COVID-19 patients was associated with less agreement with PPE recommendations (p=0.039). Using appropriate PPE and case selection in endoscopic practice during a pandemic remains a challenge. Resource availability and local prevalence are critical factors influencing the adoption of the current guidelines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The Thai Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published recommendations on safe endoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the practicality and applicability of the recommendations and the perceptions of endoscopy personnel on them.
METHODS
METHODS
A validated questionnaire was sent to 1290 endoscopy personnel globally. Of these, the data of all 330 responders (25.6%) from 15 countries, related to the current recommendations on proper personal protective equipment (PPE), case selection, scope cleaning, and safety perception, were analyzed. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between the variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Despite an overwhelming agreement with the recommendations on PPE (94.5%) and case selection (95.5%), their practicality and applicability on PPE recommendations and case selection were significantly lower (p=0.001, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.032, respectively). Factors that were associated with lower sense of safety in endoscopy units were younger age (p=0.004), less working experience (p=0.008), in-training status (p=0.04), and higher national prevalence of COVID-19 (p=0.003). High prevalent countries also had more difficulty implementing the guidelines (p<0.001) and they considered the PPE recommendations less practical and showed lower agreement with them (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). A higher number of in-hospital COVID-19 patients was associated with less agreement with PPE recommendations (p=0.039).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Using appropriate PPE and case selection in endoscopic practice during a pandemic remains a challenge. Resource availability and local prevalence are critical factors influencing the adoption of the current guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34583452
pii: ce.2021.051
doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.051
pmc: PMC8995989
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
215-225Subventions
Organisme : Chulalongkorn University
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Aug 1;45(8):e81-e86
pubmed: 28602275
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Nov 10;6:114
pubmed: 29177047
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020 May-Jun;10(3):266-270
pubmed: 32362732
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):818-824
pubmed: 30391253
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406-1407
pubmed: 32083643
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):489-493
pubmed: 32179701
Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):e620-6
pubmed: 16950954
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):991-996
pubmed: 32241897
Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1518-1519
pubmed: 32142785
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):1143-1144
pubmed: 32139552
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567
pubmed: 32182409
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e14-e18
pubmed: 32171866
Adv Data. 2005 Sep 27;(364):1-14
pubmed: 16220875
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):176-183
pubmed: 32229131
Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1831-1833.e3
pubmed: 32142773
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):192-197
pubmed: 32179106
Endoscopy. 2020 Aug;52(8):706-707
pubmed: 32722837
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797
pubmed: 22563403