Interactions between epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors/histamine type-2 receptor antagonists in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
acid suppression
drug interaction
tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
07
05
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
entrez:
29
9
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are increasingly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as first-line therapy. The bioavailability and efficacy of oral EGFR-TKIs could be affected by acid suppression (AS) therapy such as PPIs and H2RAs which are reported to be over-prescribed. Hence, there is a need to investigate the effect of AS on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effect profile in patients treated with EGFR TKIs. An electronic database search of Medline and Embase was performed following PRISMA guidelines on 17 January 2021. Studies analyzing interactions between EGFR TKIs and PPIs/H2RAs in NSCLC patients were included. Abstracts, non-English or non-Japanese studies or studies using non-EGFR TKIs were excluded. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using generic inverse variance random effects model. Effect sizes for dichotomous variables were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. Significance was considered at P≤0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q-test and I2 test. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. The assessment of quality and risk of bias of randomized and non-randomized studies were undertaken with RoB 2 and the ROBINS-I tool respectively. Out of 1,173 potentially relevant articles, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of AS in patients taking EGFR TKI was 30.71% in 4,010 individuals. Patients who were treated only with EGFR TKI had significantly better OS (HR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.27-1.72; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35-1.98; P<0.00001). The OS for EGFR mutation positive patients only was as similarly significant as the OS in all patients taking EGFR TKI, while the PFS in mutation positive patients was significantly worsened with AS. PPIs resulted in a significantly worsened OS and PFS but H2RAs did not produce significantly different OS and PFS between AS and non-AS users. There were no significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.50-1.32; P=0.40), diarrhoea (OR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.67; P=0.91) or other adverse effects. Co-administration of AS medications with first-generation EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC worsens survival outcomes. Physicians should only prescribe AS medications when absolutely clinically indicated.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are increasingly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as first-line therapy. The bioavailability and efficacy of oral EGFR-TKIs could be affected by acid suppression (AS) therapy such as PPIs and H2RAs which are reported to be over-prescribed. Hence, there is a need to investigate the effect of AS on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effect profile in patients treated with EGFR TKIs.
METHODS
METHODS
An electronic database search of Medline and Embase was performed following PRISMA guidelines on 17 January 2021. Studies analyzing interactions between EGFR TKIs and PPIs/H2RAs in NSCLC patients were included. Abstracts, non-English or non-Japanese studies or studies using non-EGFR TKIs were excluded. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using generic inverse variance random effects model. Effect sizes for dichotomous variables were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. Significance was considered at P≤0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q-test and I2 test. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. The assessment of quality and risk of bias of randomized and non-randomized studies were undertaken with RoB 2 and the ROBINS-I tool respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 1,173 potentially relevant articles, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of AS in patients taking EGFR TKI was 30.71% in 4,010 individuals. Patients who were treated only with EGFR TKI had significantly better OS (HR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.27-1.72; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35-1.98; P<0.00001). The OS for EGFR mutation positive patients only was as similarly significant as the OS in all patients taking EGFR TKI, while the PFS in mutation positive patients was significantly worsened with AS. PPIs resulted in a significantly worsened OS and PFS but H2RAs did not produce significantly different OS and PFS between AS and non-AS users. There were no significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.50-1.32; P=0.40), diarrhoea (OR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.67; P=0.91) or other adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Co-administration of AS medications with first-generation EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC worsens survival outcomes. Physicians should only prescribe AS medications when absolutely clinically indicated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34584857
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-378
pii: tlcr-10-08-3567
pmc: PMC8435386
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3567-3581Informations de copyright
2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-378). LW is supported by Joint National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS) and NUS Cancer Program Seed Funding Grants/2020, National University of Singapore. BCG is supported by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore (NMRC/CSA-SI/0006/2016 and NMRC/CG/M005/2017_NCIS). RS is part of the advisory board for Astra-Zeneca, AMGEN, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Taiho, Takeda, and Yuhan; and research funding from Astra-Zeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 11;10(1):14965
pubmed: 32917914
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):412-418
pubmed: 26944770
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13
pubmed: 15840177
BMJ. 2015 Aug 14;351:h4419
pubmed: 26276792
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 May 15;62(10 Suppl 2):S4-S10
pubmed: 15905600
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Dec;40(6):699-704
pubmed: 29995672
Mol Pharm. 2013 Nov 4;10(11):4055-62
pubmed: 24044612
BMC Med. 2016 Nov 9;14(1):179
pubmed: 27825371
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Apr;3(4):515-22
pubmed: 9815714
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Jan;16(1):33-9
pubmed: 25246385
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2129-39
pubmed: 15118073
Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34
pubmed: 9921604
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 18;12(4):
pubmed: 32325628
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):767-773
pubmed: 27737436
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;58(4):474-484
pubmed: 29178442
BMJ. 2007 Jan 13;334(7584):94-6
pubmed: 17218716
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Sep;10(3):476-483
pubmed: 30945438
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;77(3):381-388
pubmed: 33029650
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):735-42
pubmed: 21783417
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Jul 09;12:5467-5484
pubmed: 31371986
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):e315-26
pubmed: 24988935
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Science. 2004 Jun 4;304(5676):1497-500
pubmed: 15118125
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;92(2):203-13
pubmed: 22739140
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Sep 19;11:8539-8546
pubmed: 31572008
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;78(2):427-32
pubmed: 27372908
Gastroenterology. 2008 Jun;134(7):1842-60
pubmed: 18474247
J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):416-21
pubmed: 18725049
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46
pubmed: 22285168
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jun 15;17(12):1503-6
pubmed: 12823152
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):136-42
pubmed: 23910908
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0149722
pubmed: 26894507
J BUON. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):647-653
pubmed: 30003732
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002
pubmed: 21784880