Risk analysis in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies: Malignant or benign?
Biopsy
lymphadenopathy
malignancy
Journal
Northern clinics of Istanbul
ISSN: 2536-4553
Titre abrégé: North Clin Istanb
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101684520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
accepted:
04
12
2020
entrez:
29
9
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of the study was to determine the parameters that can be used to predict malignancy in persistent cervical lymphadenopathies. We retrospectively reviewed the files of 162 patients diagnosed with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy who underwent an excisional biopsy in our department between January 2011 and October 2019. Patient demographics and the size, side, duration, and localization of lymphadenopathy were recorded, and their relationship with histopathological results was investigated. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between clinical parameters and malignancy. Of the 162 patients, 91 (56.2%) were male and 71 (43.8%) were female, and the mean age was 45.40±20.41 (2-84) years. Male gender (OR=3.099; p=0.003), increasing age (OR=1.029; p=0.002), short duration of lymphadenopathy (OR=0.989; p=0.048), and neck level V (OR=2.604; p=0.031) patients had a statistically significantly higher risk of malignancy. There was no statistically significant relationship between the side and size of the lymph node and the risk of malignancy (p>0.05). In our study, male gender was determined to be the most predictive risk factor for malignancy in patients with cervical lymphadenopathy, followed by lymph node neck level, increased age, and duration of the disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34585069
doi: 10.14744/nci.2020.29895
pii: NCI-8-354
pmc: PMC8430358
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
354-358Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 by Istanbul Northern Anatolian Association of Public Hospitals.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Références
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;78(3):393-401
pubmed: 24447684
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Dec 1;94(11):896-903
pubmed: 27929264
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):251-6
pubmed: 26187739
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Mar;125(3):303-7
pubmed: 10190802
Pediatr Surg Int. 2003 Jun;19(4):240-4
pubmed: 12700919
Head Neck. 2012 Mar;34(3):371-5
pubmed: 21472886
Br J Cancer. 2003 Feb 10;88(3):354-61
pubmed: 12569376
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;272(3):745-52
pubmed: 25294051
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Apr;45(4):784-8
pubmed: 20385287
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Feb;36(1):71-4
pubmed: 18479855
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Feb;28(1):34-8
pubmed: 12580878
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;34(7):817-21
pubmed: 17804191