Early experience of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in Japanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice.
Alpha-fetoprotein
Atezolizumab
Bevacizumab
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Later-line
Journal
Investigational new drugs
ISSN: 1573-0646
Titre abrégé: Invest New Drugs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309330
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
08
08
2021
accepted:
21
09
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
13
4
2022
entrez:
29
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) based on whether they had previously received systemic therapy, as well as the association of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in real-world practice. A total of 52 patients with u-HCC were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between October 2020 and April 2021. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST were used to evaluate radiological responses. The patients received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line (n = 23), 2nd-line (n = 16), 3rd-line (n = 6), 4th-line (n = 3), 5th-line (n = 3), or 6th-line (n = 1) therapy. According to RECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in all patients were 15.4% and 57.7%. In the 1st-line patients, ORR and DCR based on RECIST 1.1 were 27.3% and 81.8%. The median time to progression (TTP) assessed by RECIST was significantly longer among patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line therapy than in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as later-line therapy (P < 0.001). Patients with an AFP response (reduction ≥ 20% from baseline) at 6 weeks had a significantly longer TTP assessed by RECIST than those without an AFP response (P = 0.02). Patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line therapy had better clinical outcome than those who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in later lines. The AFP response at 6 weeks could be a predictor of disease progression.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) based on whether they had previously received systemic therapy, as well as the association of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in real-world practice.
METHODS
A total of 52 patients with u-HCC were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between October 2020 and April 2021. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST were used to evaluate radiological responses.
RESULTS
The patients received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line (n = 23), 2nd-line (n = 16), 3rd-line (n = 6), 4th-line (n = 3), 5th-line (n = 3), or 6th-line (n = 1) therapy. According to RECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in all patients were 15.4% and 57.7%. In the 1st-line patients, ORR and DCR based on RECIST 1.1 were 27.3% and 81.8%. The median time to progression (TTP) assessed by RECIST was significantly longer among patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line therapy than in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as later-line therapy (P < 0.001). Patients with an AFP response (reduction ≥ 20% from baseline) at 6 weeks had a significantly longer TTP assessed by RECIST than those without an AFP response (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION
Patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as 1st-line therapy had better clinical outcome than those who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in later lines. The AFP response at 6 weeks could be a predictor of disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34586531
doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01185-4
pii: 10.1007/s10637-021-01185-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
alpha-Fetoproteins
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
392-402Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:378–390
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:25–34
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7
Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P et al (2017) Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:56–66
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S et al (2018) Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391:1163–1173
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1
Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng AL et al (2018) Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 379:54–63
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717002
Park JO, Ryoo BY, Yen CJ et al (2016) Second-line ramucirumab therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (REACH): An East Asian and non-East Asian subgroup analysis. Oncotarget 7:75482–75491
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12780
Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ et al (2019) Ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein following sorafenib (REACH-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:282–296
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30937-9
Finn RS, Ducreux M, Qin S et al (2018) IMbrave150: A randomized phase III study of 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sorafenib in locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 36:TPS4141–TPS4141
Kokudo N, Takemura N, Hasegawa K et al (2019) Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2017 (4th JSH-HCC guidelines) 2019 update. Hepatol Res 49:1109–1113
doi: 10.1111/hepr.13411
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin C et al (2018) Diagnosis, staging and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68:723–750
doi: 10.1002/hep.29913
European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247
Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132
Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C et al (2014) Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol 33:550–558
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9151
Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Tsuji K et al (2019) Validation of modified ALBI Grade for more detailed assessment of hepatic function in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A multicenter analysis. Liver Cancer 8:121–129
doi: 10.1159/000488778
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–445
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK et al (2020) Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 38:4317–4345
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02672
Vogel A, Martinelli E (2021) Updated treatment recommendations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 32:801–805
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.014
Kuzuya T, Kawabe N, Hashimoto S et al (2021) Initial experience of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice. Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis 1:19–22
doi: 10.21873/cdp.10012
Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Tada T et al (2021) Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Early clinical experience. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) e1464
Iwamoto H, Shimose S, Noda Y et al (2021) Initial experience of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world clinical practice. Cancers 13:2786
doi: 10.3390/cancers13112786
Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M et al (2020) Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 382:1894–1905
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745
Terashima T, Yamashita T, Sunagozawa H et al (2018) Analysis of the liver functional reserve of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing sorafenib treatment: prospects for regorafenib therapy. Hepatol Res 48:956–966
doi: 10.1111/hepr.13196
Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Atsukawa M et al (2019) Early relative change in hepatic function with Lenvatinib for Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 97:334–340
doi: 10.1159/000502095
Sangro B, Park J, Finn R et al (2020) CheckMate 459: long-term (minimum follow-up 33.6 months) servival outcomes with nivolmab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 31:241–242
Kudo M, Galle PR, Brandi G et al (2021) Effect of ramucirumab on ALBI grade in patients with advanced HCC: results from REACH and REACH-2. JHEP Rep 3:100215
Kuzuya T, Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K et al (2011) Early decrease in alpha-fetoprotein, but not des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, predicts sorafenib efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 81:251–258
doi: 10.1159/000334454
Kuzuya T, Ishigami M, Ishizu Y et al (2016) Fever within 2 weeks of Sorafenib therapy predicts favorable treatment efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 91:261–266
doi: 10.1159/000449000
Kodama K, Kawaoka T, Namba M et al (2019) Correlation between early tumor marker response and imaging response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib. Oncology 97:75–81
doi: 10.1159/000499715
Lee PC, Chao Y, Chen MH, Lan KH et al (2020) Predictors of response and survival in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers 12:182
doi: 10.3390/cancers12010182
Aoki T, Kudo M, Ueshima K et al (2020) Exploratory analysis of lenvatinib therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who have failed prior PD−1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Cancers 12:3048
doi: 10.3390/cancers12103048