Anterior openbite malocclusion in adults.
Anterior openbite
Retention
Satisfaction
Stability
Journal
The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2022
01 Jan 2022
Historique:
accepted:
01
08
2021
received:
01
07
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
29
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate stability and satisfaction in adult anterior open bite (AOB) patients at least 9 months post-treatment, as well as patient and practitioner factors that may be associated with stability and satisfaction. Practitioners and their adult AOB patients were recruited through the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Data on patient and practitioner characteristics, treatment recommendations and factors were previously collected. Treatment stability was determined by assessing post-treatment intraoral photographs. Patient satisfaction was determined from post-treatment questionnaires. Treatment was categorized into aligners, fixed appliances, temporary anchorage devices, and orthognathic surgery. Extractions were also investigated. Retention type was categorized into vacuum-formed, Hawley-style, or bonded retainers, and regimens were classified as full-time or part-time wear. Retention data collected from 112 patients had a mean post-treatment time of 1.21 years. There were no statistically significant differences in stability between treatment groups. Depending on whether a qualitative index or a millimetric measure was employed, stability ranged from 65% to 89%. Extractions and less initial lower incisor proclination were associated with higher stability in patients treated with fixed appliances only. High satisfaction was reported by patients at retention. There were no clear differences in stability or satisfaction among retention types or regimens. The stability of adult AOB orthodontic treatment was high, regardless of treatment or retainer modality. Satisfaction in adult AOB patients was high, regardless of retention type or regimen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34587249
pii: 470757
doi: 10.2319/071221-549.1
pmc: PMC8691483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27-35Subventions
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : U19 DE022516
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : U19 DE028717
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e137-e150
pubmed: 33250106
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Feb;139(2):154-69
pubmed: 21300243
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Dec;156(6):717-726.e2
pubmed: 31784005
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22 Suppl 1:149-153
pubmed: 31074131
Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):533-9
pubmed: 20050749
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):238-47
pubmed: 25214504
J Orofac Orthop. 2009 Jul;70(4):318-26
pubmed: 19649579
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97-106
pubmed: 9743642
Angle Orthod. 1990 Spring;60(1):17-24; discussion 25-6
pubmed: 2316899
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):312-325
pubmed: 31474261
J Clin Orthod. 2007 Sep;41(9):525-47; quiz 523
pubmed: 17921600
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):585-91
pubmed: 19413386
Dent Update. 2003 Jun;30(5):235-41
pubmed: 12861760
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):652-9
pubmed: 26432321
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):768-74
pubmed: 16769495
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jan;77(1):181-91
pubmed: 17029533