Influence of relative density on quasi-static and fatigue failure of lattice structures in Ti6Al4V produced by laser powder bed fusion.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 09 2021
Historique:
received: 23 07 2021
accepted: 08 09 2021
entrez: 30 9 2021
pubmed: 1 10 2021
medline: 1 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Lattice structures produced by additive manufacturing have been increasingly studied in recent years due to their potential to tailor prescribed mechanical properties. Their mechanical performances are influenced by several factors such as unit cell topology, parent material and relative density. In this study, static and dynamic behaviors of Ti6Al4V lattice structures were analyzed focusing on the criteria used to define the failure of lattices. A modified face-centered cubic (FCCm) lattice structure was designed to avoid the manufacturing problems that arise in the production of horizontal struts by laser powder bed fusion. The Gibson-Ashby curves of the FCCm lattice were obtained and it was found that relative density not only affects stiffness and strength of the structures, but also has important implications on the assumption of macroscopic yield criterion. Regarding fatigue properties, a stiffness based criterion was analyzed to improve the assessment of lattice structure failure in load bearing applications, and the influence of relative density on the stiffness evolution was studied. Apart from common normalization of S-N curves, a more accurate fatigue failure surface was developed, which is also compatible with stiffness based failure criteria. Finally, the effect of hot isostatic pressing in FCCm structures was also studied.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34588524
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98631-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-98631-3
pmc: PMC8481248
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19314

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Acta Biomater. 2017 Jan 1;47:193-202
pubmed: 27717912
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Oct;98:357-368
pubmed: 31319282
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Dec 1;33(8):4849-58
pubmed: 24094196
Acta Biomater. 2019 Oct 1;97:637-656
pubmed: 31394295
Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan;65:292-304
pubmed: 29127065
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2006 Jan 15;364(1838):15-30
pubmed: 18272451
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 26;113(30):8386-90
pubmed: 27410042
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jun;34:106-15
pubmed: 24566381
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4957
pubmed: 29563593
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Mar;43:91-100
pubmed: 25579495
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jun;70:7-16
pubmed: 27998687
Acta Biomater. 2021 May;126:511-523
pubmed: 33711528
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Mar;79:254-263
pubmed: 29335192
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;83:153-166
pubmed: 30389577

Auteurs

Markel Alaña (M)

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials, Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13, 20018, San Sebastian, Spain. malana@tecnun.es.

Antonio Cutolo (A)

KU Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300, 3001, Leuven (Heverlee), Belgium.

Sergio Ruiz de Galarreta (S)

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials, Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13, 20018, San Sebastian, Spain.

Brecht Van Hooreweder (B)

KU Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300, 3001, Leuven (Heverlee), Belgium.
Members Flanders Make, Leuven, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH