Evaluation of Renal Allograft Vasculature Using Non-contrast 3D Inversion Recovery Balanced Steady-state Free Precession MRA and 2D Quiescent-interval Slice-selective MRA.

Angiography Non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography Quiescent-interval slice-selective Renal transplant artery stenosis

Journal

Exploratory research and hypothesis in medicine
ISSN: 2472-0712
Titre abrégé: Explor Res Hypothesis Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101712959

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez: 30 9 2021
pubmed: 1 10 2021
medline: 1 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Renal transplant patients often require periodic imaging to evaluate the transplant vessel anastomosis for potential vascular complications. The use of non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) techniques is encouraged in these patients because they are at increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) due to their renal insufficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two NCE-MRA techniques (three-dimensional [3D] balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP] with inversion recovery and quiescent-interval slice-selective [QISS]) for the evaluation of renal allograft vasculature in patients with clinical suspicion, or Doppler ultrasound, or both of arterial anastomotic stenosis. A total of 43 patients were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently scored the images from 3D bSSFP and QISS MRA sequences for image quality and confidence in anastomosis interpretation, and the degree of stenosis at the arterial anastomosis. Correlations with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were carried out when available. In addition, inter-rater agreement was calculated. In total, 43 patients underwent QISS and 3D bSSFP MRA. For QISS, all cases were adequate for evaluation. For 3D SSFP, 86% of cases were adequate for evaluation. There was a good-to-excellent inter-rater agreement for all scores and an excellent correlation between NCE-MRA and DSA results when available (12 patients). QISS and 3D SSFP showed good inter-rater agreement for image quality and stenosis grade, with more cases being of adequate image quality that used QISS. Further study is required; however, NCE-MRA shows potential as a risk-free alternative to CTA and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) for the evaluation of arterial anastomoses in renal transplant patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Renal transplant patients often require periodic imaging to evaluate the transplant vessel anastomosis for potential vascular complications. The use of non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) techniques is encouraged in these patients because they are at increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) due to their renal insufficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two NCE-MRA techniques (three-dimensional [3D] balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP] with inversion recovery and quiescent-interval slice-selective [QISS]) for the evaluation of renal allograft vasculature in patients with clinical suspicion, or Doppler ultrasound, or both of arterial anastomotic stenosis.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 43 patients were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently scored the images from 3D bSSFP and QISS MRA sequences for image quality and confidence in anastomosis interpretation, and the degree of stenosis at the arterial anastomosis. Correlations with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were carried out when available. In addition, inter-rater agreement was calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 43 patients underwent QISS and 3D bSSFP MRA. For QISS, all cases were adequate for evaluation. For 3D SSFP, 86% of cases were adequate for evaluation. There was a good-to-excellent inter-rater agreement for all scores and an excellent correlation between NCE-MRA and DSA results when available (12 patients).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
QISS and 3D SSFP showed good inter-rater agreement for image quality and stenosis grade, with more cases being of adequate image quality that used QISS. Further study is required; however, NCE-MRA shows potential as a risk-free alternative to CTA and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) for the evaluation of arterial anastomoses in renal transplant patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34589655
doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2021.00011
pmc: PMC8478288
mid: NIHMS1703529
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

90-98

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL130093
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R21 HL126015
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest Robert R. Edelman received research support and royalties from Siemens Healthcare. The other authors report no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

Références

Radiographics. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(4):1109-30
pubmed: 17620470
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2017;8(2):78-84
pubmed: 28828167
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:42-49
pubmed: 28583646
J Urol. 1995 Jan;153(1):18-21
pubmed: 7966766
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):951-8
pubmed: 20373396
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):535-42
pubmed: 19261926
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1064-1073
pubmed: 28858538
J Ultrasound. 2014 Apr 11;18(2):101-7
pubmed: 26191097
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Dec;70(6):1662-8
pubmed: 23348595
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1:21-116
pubmed: 28052609
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Dec;38(6):1573-88
pubmed: 26088719
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):914-918
pubmed: 30714829
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):914-21
pubmed: 19635833
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):879-87
pubmed: 24592960
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4195-4204
pubmed: 29666993
Clin Transpl. 1992;:1-16
pubmed: 1306688
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Feb;32(2):190-5
pubmed: 24246390
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1579-1584
pubmed: 29063255
Radiol Clin North Am. 1995 May;33(3):461-71
pubmed: 7740106
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Jan;15(1):134-41
pubmed: 14694165
Radiographics. 2000 May-Jun;20(3):607-22
pubmed: 10835115

Auteurs

Ali Serhal (A)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Pascale Aouad (P)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Muhamad Serhal (M)

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Ashitha Pathrose (A)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Pamela Lombardi (P)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

James Carr (J)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Ryan Avery (R)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Robert R Edelman (RR)

Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Radiology, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.

Classifications MeSH