Young adults' preferences for influenza vaccination campaign messages: Implications for COVID-19 vaccine intervention design and development.

COVID-19 COVID-19, The coronavirus 2019 HPV, Human papillomavirus Health campaign Health messaging Intervention Message tailoring Thematic analysis Vaccination

Journal

Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
ISSN: 2666-3546
Titre abrégé: Brain Behav Immun Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101759062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 11 02 2021
revised: 09 04 2021
accepted: 13 04 2021
entrez: 30 9 2021
pubmed: 1 10 2021
medline: 1 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Health campaign interventions, particularly those tailored to the target audience's needs and preferences, can cost-effectively change people's attitudes and behaviors towards better health decision-making. However, there is limited research on how to best tailor seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns for young adults. Vaccination is vital in protecting young adults and their social circles (vulnerable populations like older adults) from the influenza virus and critical in shaping these emerging adults' vaccination habits in the long run. However, amid the prevalence of easily-accessible, attention-grabbing, and often malicious false and misinformation (e.g., COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories), it may be more challenging to develop vaccination messages that resonate with young adults well enough to attract their attention. Therefore, to bridge the research gap, this study examines young adults' preferences for seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns to inform effective intervention design and development. Qualitative survey questions were developed to gauge young adults' preferences for seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. A total of 545 young adults (73.9% female, Mage ​= ​19.89, SD ​= ​1.44) from a large University offered complete answers to a cross-sectional online survey. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis procedures were adopted to guide the data analysis process. Thematic analysis revealed that young adults prefer seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns that rely on (1) quality and balanced information from (2) credible information sources, positioned in the (3) relevant health contexts, (4) emphasize actionable messages, and incorporate (5) persuasive campaign design. Interestingly, while many participants underscored the importance of fear-appeal messages in persuading them to take health actions, some young adults also suggested avoiding fear campaigns due to discomfort. Insights of the study can inform seasonal influenza vaccination design and development, and have the potential to shed light on vaccination messaging in other vaccine contexts, such as COVID-19 vaccines. Results also underscore the need for health experts and government officials to adopt a more nuanced approach when selecting persuasive campaign appeals. While some young adults may resonate well with fear appeals, others may not. Future research could examine the underlying mechanisms that drive young adults' preference for vaccination campaign intervention to enrich the literature further.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health campaign interventions, particularly those tailored to the target audience's needs and preferences, can cost-effectively change people's attitudes and behaviors towards better health decision-making. However, there is limited research on how to best tailor seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns for young adults. Vaccination is vital in protecting young adults and their social circles (vulnerable populations like older adults) from the influenza virus and critical in shaping these emerging adults' vaccination habits in the long run. However, amid the prevalence of easily-accessible, attention-grabbing, and often malicious false and misinformation (e.g., COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories), it may be more challenging to develop vaccination messages that resonate with young adults well enough to attract their attention. Therefore, to bridge the research gap, this study examines young adults' preferences for seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns to inform effective intervention design and development.
METHODS METHODS
Qualitative survey questions were developed to gauge young adults' preferences for seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. A total of 545 young adults (73.9% female, Mage ​= ​19.89, SD ​= ​1.44) from a large University offered complete answers to a cross-sectional online survey. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis procedures were adopted to guide the data analysis process.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thematic analysis revealed that young adults prefer seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns that rely on (1) quality and balanced information from (2) credible information sources, positioned in the (3) relevant health contexts, (4) emphasize actionable messages, and incorporate (5) persuasive campaign design. Interestingly, while many participants underscored the importance of fear-appeal messages in persuading them to take health actions, some young adults also suggested avoiding fear campaigns due to discomfort.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Insights of the study can inform seasonal influenza vaccination design and development, and have the potential to shed light on vaccination messaging in other vaccine contexts, such as COVID-19 vaccines. Results also underscore the need for health experts and government officials to adopt a more nuanced approach when selecting persuasive campaign appeals. While some young adults may resonate well with fear appeals, others may not. Future research could examine the underlying mechanisms that drive young adults' preference for vaccination campaign intervention to enrich the literature further.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34589767
doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100261
pii: S2666-3546(21)00064-8
pmc: PMC8474560
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100261

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Dec;23(12):811-817
pubmed: 32757951
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42
pubmed: 24590751
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 22;36(27):3960-3966
pubmed: 29801998
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 8;7(2):e17149
pubmed: 33555267
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Aug 2;16(8):1824-1834
pubmed: 31916905
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Sep 11;12:158-163
pubmed: 30263886
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):473-4
pubmed: 10818125
J Health Commun. 2016;21(4):439-56
pubmed: 26953782
Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Jun;4(2):182-90
pubmed: 26627213
Lancet. 2020 Sep 26;396(10255):877
pubmed: 32919523
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 4;7(8):e26111
pubmed: 33560997
Health Promot Int. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):1125-1136
pubmed: 31687738
Global Health. 2018 Feb 13;14(1):20
pubmed: 29439728
Vaccines (Basel). 2019 Dec 24;8(1):
pubmed: 31878271
Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1261-71
pubmed: 20933263
J Health Commun. 2006;11(1):21-42
pubmed: 16546917
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Feb 26;12(2):e0006288
pubmed: 29481558
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e27632
pubmed: 34061757
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 19;17(12):
pubmed: 32575519
Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32
pubmed: 14672383
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Dec;9:100159
pubmed: 33052327
J Med Ethics. 2016 Jun;42(6):391-6
pubmed: 27178532
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;973:125-134
pubmed: 28452003
Ann Behav Med. 1999 Fall;21(4):276-83
pubmed: 10721433
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:52-60
pubmed: 31202092
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):239-50
pubmed: 25901502
J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(8):435-43
pubmed: 24152021
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):622-30
pubmed: 26297090
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 26;38(31):4909-4915
pubmed: 32482460
Global Health. 2021 Jan 5;17(1):4
pubmed: 33402169
J Health Commun. 2016 Oct;21(10):1088-97
pubmed: 27668454
Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300
pubmed: 9414606
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Mar;12:100204
pubmed: 33495754
Vaccine. 2018 Mar 14;36(12):1556-1560
pubmed: 29439866
Soc Mar Q. 2011 Spring;17(1):4-26
pubmed: 21804767
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2586-2593
pubmed: 32693678
Ann Ig. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):35-44
pubmed: 30554237
Health Commun. 2018 Jan;33(1):32-40
pubmed: 27858470
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(10):2453-2459
pubmed: 30852936
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Nov;16(6):897-905
pubmed: 26220277
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240828
pubmed: 33064738
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):
pubmed: 32895218
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1120-1122
pubmed: 30089001
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):1131
pubmed: 30236092
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 21;20(12):e11439
pubmed: 30578201
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;141(1):63-69
pubmed: 29197067
Health Commun. 2012;27(5):413-20
pubmed: 21957983

Auteurs

Zhaohui Su (Z)

Incoming Postdoctoral Fellow, Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, Mays Cancer Center, School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.

Dean McDonnell (D)

Department of Humanities, Institute of Technology Carlow, Carlow, R93 V960, Ireland.

Jun Wen (J)

School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, 6027, Australia.

Ali Cheshmehzangi (A)

Head of Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Professor of Architecture and Urban Design, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315100, China.

Junaid Ahmad (J)

Prime Institute of Public Health, Peshawar Medical College, Peshawar, Warsak Road, Peshawar, 25160, Pakistan.

Edmund Goh (E)

School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, 6027, Australia.

Xiaoshan Li (X)

Program of Public Relations and Advertising, Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, China.

Sabina Šegalo (S)

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Michael Mackert (M)

Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Center for Health Communication, Moody College of Communication, Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78702, USA.

Yu-Tao Xiang (YT)

Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China.

Peiyu Wang (P)

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China.

Classifications MeSH