A Pan-Canadian Validation Study for the Detection of
EGFR T790M variant
Liquid biopsy
Non–small cell lung cancer
Plasma ctDNA testing
Journal
JTO clinical and research reports
ISSN: 2666-3643
Titre abrégé: JTO Clin Res Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769967
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
11
05
2021
revised:
23
06
2021
accepted:
08
07
2021
entrez:
30
9
2021
pubmed:
1
10
2021
medline:
1
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genotyping circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising noninvasive clinical tool to identify the In phase 1, commercial reference standards were distributed to participating clinical laboratories, to use their existing platforms for mutation detection. Baseline performance characteristics were established using known and blinded engineered plasma samples spiked with predetermined concentrations of T790M, L858R, and exon 19 deletion variants. In phase II, peripheral blood collected from local patients with known All laboratories in phase 1 detected the variants at 0.5 % and 5.0 % allele frequencies, with no false positives. In phase 2, the concordance with the reference laboratory for detection of both the primary and resistance mutation was high, with next-generation sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction exhibiting the best overall concordance. Data also suggested that the ability to detect mutations at clinically relevant limits of detection is generally not platform-specific, but rather impacted by laboratory-specific practices. Discrepancies among sending laboratories using the same assay suggest that laboratory-specific practices may impact performance. In addition, a negative or inconclusive ctDNA test should be followed by tumor testing when possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34590051
doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100212
pii: S2666-3643(21)00071-0
pmc: PMC8474449
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100212Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0230622
pubmed: 32196518
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):17-22
pubmed: 23129736
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Sep;12(9):1376-1387
pubmed: 28552765
Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 15;67(16):7807-14
pubmed: 17699786
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Apr;3(4):451-2
pubmed: 18379370
Curr Oncol. 2020 Dec;27(6):321-329
pubmed: 33380864
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Apr;10(4):603-10
pubmed: 25514801
J Pathol. 2018 Apr;244(5):565-577
pubmed: 29344953
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Jan;21(1):1-14.e3
pubmed: 31601525
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):173-180
pubmed: 30325992
Sci Rep. 2014 Sep 09;4:6269
pubmed: 25201768
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Sep;19(5):722-732
pubmed: 28723342
Cancer Discov. 2016 May;6(5):479-91
pubmed: 26969689
Thorax. 2013 Jun;68(6):551-64
pubmed: 23399908
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 15;19(8):2240-7
pubmed: 23470965
Cancer. 2021 Aug 15;127(16):3019-3028
pubmed: 33826761
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jul;14(7):1128-1133
pubmed: 31235034
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24
pubmed: 24553385
Cell Rep. 2020 Jun 30;31(13):107830
pubmed: 32610131
Adv Clin Chem. 2017;79:43-91
pubmed: 28212714
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Nov 6;11(1):129
pubmed: 30400986
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 1;22(5):1103-10
pubmed: 26446944
J Clin Pathol. 2021 Feb;74(2):91-97
pubmed: 32471890
Curr Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(2):163-169
pubmed: 29719432
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;21(5):e464-e473
pubmed: 32276870
Lung Cancer. 2015 Dec;90(3):509-15
pubmed: 26494259
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jan;11(1):39-51
pubmed: 26762738
PLoS Med. 2005 Mar;2(3):e73
pubmed: 15737014
Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(9):725-737
pubmed: 31564718