Peritoneal Pre-conditioning Method for In Vivo Vascular Graft Maturation Utilizing a Porous Pouch.

Electrospun conduits Hydrogel In situ tissue engineering Peritoneal cavity Small-diameter arteries Vascular graft

Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
entrez: 30 9 2021
pubmed: 1 10 2021
medline: 6 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) require strategies to allow graft remodeling but avoid stenosis and loss of graft mechanics. A variety of promising biomaterials and methods to incorporate cells have been tested, but intimal hyperplasia and graft thrombosis are still concerning when grafting in small-diameter arteries. Here, we describe a strategy using the peritoneal cavity as an "in vivo" bioreactor to recruit autologous cells to electrospun conduits, which can improve the in vivo response after aortic grafting. We focus on the methods for a novel hydrogel pouch design to enclose the electrospun conduits that can avoid peritoneal adhesion but still allow infiltration of peritoneal fluid and cells needed to provide benefits when subsequently grafting in the aorta.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34591301
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1708-3_8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biocompatible Materials 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

91-99

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Shojaee M, Bashur CA (2017) Compositions including synthetic and natural blends for integration and structural integrity: engineered for different vascular graft applications. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1700001
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700001
Nieponice A et al (2010) In Vivo assessment of a tissue-engineered vascular graft combining a biodegradable elastomeric scaffold and muscle-derived stem cells in a rat model. Tissue Eng Part A 16:1215–1223
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0427
Singh C, Wong C, Wang X (2015) Medical textiles as vascular implants and their success to mimic natural arteries. J Funct Biomater 6:500–525
doi: 10.3390/jfb6030500
Ribas LM et al (2017) Experimental implantation of an arterial substitute made of silicone reinforced with polyester fabric in rabbits. Clinics 72:780–784
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(12)10
Pashneh-Tala S, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F (2016) The tissue-engineered vascular graft—past, present, and future. Tissue Eng B Rev 22:68–100
doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100
Syedain Z et al (2016) Tissue engineering of acellular vascular grafts capable of somatic growth in young lambs. Nat Commun 7:12951
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12951
Klinkert P, Post PN, Breslau PJ, van Bockel JH (2004) Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:357–362
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027
Roger VL et al (2012) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 125:e2–e220
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318245fac5
Williams DF (2019) Challenges with the development of biomaterials for sustainable tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:127
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00127
Thottappillil N, Nair PD (2015) Scaffolds in vascular regeneration: current status. Vasc Health Risk Manag 11:79–91
pubmed: 25632236 pmcid: 4304530
van Wachem PB, Stronck JWS, Koers-Zuideveld R, Dijk F, Wildevuur CRH (1990) Vacuum cell seeding: a new method for the fast application of an evenly distributed cell layer on porous vascular grafts. Biomaterials 11:602–606
doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(90)90086-6
Pawlowski KJ, Rittgers SE, Schmidt SP, Bowlin GL (2004) Endothelial cell seeding of polymeric vascular grafts. Front Biosci 9:1412–1421
doi: 10.2741/1302
Roh JD et al (2008) Small-diameter biodegradable scaffolds for functional vascular tissue engineering in the mouse model. Biomaterials 29:1454–1463
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.041
Perea H, Aigner J, Hopfner U, Wintermantel E (2006) Direct magnetic tubular cell seeding: a novel approach for vascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs 183:156–165
doi: 10.1159/000095989
Tiwari A, Punshon G, Kidane A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM (2003) Magnetic beads (Dynabead™) toxicity to endothelial cells at high bead concentration: implication for tissue engineering of vascular prosthesis. Cell Biol Toxicol 19:265–272
doi: 10.1023/B:CBTO.0000004929.37511.ed
Shojaee M, Wood KB, Moore LK, Bashur CA (2017) Peritoneal pre-conditioning reduces macrophage marker expression in collagen-containing engineered vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 64:80–93
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.006
Song L, Wang L, Shah PK, Chaux A, Sharifi BG (2010) Bioengineered vascular graft grown in the mouse peritoneal cavity. J Vasc Surg 52:994–1002
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.015
Furukoshi M, Moriwaki T, Nakayama Y (2016) Development of an in vivo tissue-engineered vascular graft with designed wall thickness (biotube type C) based on a novel caged mold. J Artif Organs 19:54–61
doi: 10.1007/s10047-015-0859-4
Birthare K, Shojaee M, Jones CG, Brenner JR, Bashur CA (2016) Collagen incorporation within electrospun conduits reduces lipid oxidation and impacts conduit mechanics. Biomed Mater 11:025019
doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/2/025019
Bashur CA, Eagleton MJ, Ramamurthi A (2013) Impact of electrospun conduit fiber diameter and enclosing pouch pore size on vascular constructs grown within rat peritoneal cavities. Tissue Eng Part A 19:809–823
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0309
Chue WL et al (2004) Dog peritoneal and pleural cavities as bioreactors to grow autologous vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg 39:859–867
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.03.003
Shojaee M et al (2020) Design and characterization of a porous pouch to prevent peritoneal adhesions during in vivo vascular graft maturation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 102:103461
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103461
Nezarati RM, Eifert MB, Cosgriff-Hernandez E (2013) Effects of humidity and solution viscosity on electrospun fiber morphology. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19:810–819
doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671
Hu CL, Crombie G, Franzblau C (1978) A new assay for collagenolytic activity. Anal Biochem 88:638–643
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90467-0

Auteurs

Mahyar Sameti (M)

Department of Biomedical, Chemical Engineering, and Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA.

Chris A Bashur (CA)

Department of Biomedical, Chemical Engineering, and Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA. cbashur@fit.edu.

Articles similaires

Organoids Humans Tissue Engineering Coculture Techniques Regenerative Medicine
Organoids Animals Kidney Mice Humans

Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.

Ana Beatriz G de Carvalho, Maedeh Rahimnejad, Rodrigo L M S Oliveira et al.
1.00
Humans Bone Regeneration Ceramics Printing, Three-Dimensional Tissue Scaffolds

Aminoacid functionalised magnetite nanoparticles Fe

Spoială Angela, Motelica Ludmila, Ilie Cornelia-Ioana et al.
1.00
Magnetite Nanoparticles Tryptophan Biocompatible Materials Microbial Sensitivity Tests Humans

Classifications MeSH