How does social evaluation influence Hot and Cool inhibitory control in adolescence?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 27 04 2020
accepted: 09 09 2021
entrez: 30 9 2021
pubmed: 1 10 2021
medline: 20 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34591880
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257753
pii: PONE-D-20-12097
pmc: PMC8483316
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0257753

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Apr;52(3):216-24
pubmed: 20213754
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):284-295
pubmed: 29470796
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):972-979
pubmed: 27050317
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Dec;10(4):446-54
pubmed: 5708047
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Feb;20(2):152-6
pubmed: 24468077
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jul;2(3):293-302
pubmed: 22669033
Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):80-86
pubmed: 31961183
J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):117-33
pubmed: 24277579
Sci Rep. 2017 May 18;7(1):2088
pubmed: 28522823
Dev Psychol. 2008 Nov;44(6):1764-78
pubmed: 18999337
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 10;8:2311
pubmed: 29367850
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):636-50
pubmed: 22903221
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):621-37
pubmed: 21044790
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1410-6
pubmed: 25673216
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):267-77
pubmed: 18354399
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 01;10(6):e0128047
pubmed: 26030134
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0188276
pubmed: 29155893
Dev Rev. 2008 Mar;28(1):78-106
pubmed: 18509515
Dev Sci. 2018 Jan;21(1):
pubmed: 27882631
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):121-127
pubmed: 24761055
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 20;5:915
pubmed: 25191295
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):52-8
pubmed: 20081161
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2016 Spring;2016(151):61-72
pubmed: 26994725
Dev Sci. 2011 Mar;14(2):F1-10
pubmed: 21499511
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9
pubmed: 19564050
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Sep;15(9):1184-91
pubmed: 22929913
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Oct;10(10):1383-91
pubmed: 25759470
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):322-30
pubmed: 26791822
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):1011-25
pubmed: 10573878
Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):323-32
pubmed: 23998675
Science. 1965 Jul 16;149(3681):269-74
pubmed: 14300526
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jul;41(4):625-35
pubmed: 16060809
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):549-62
pubmed: 26911914
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 23;9:148
pubmed: 25852528
Dev Psychobiol. 2018 Apr;60(3):292-302
pubmed: 29388187
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):945-955
pubmed: 30137631

Auteurs

Lison Bouhours (L)

Université de Paris, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, Paris, France.

Anaëlle Camarda (A)

Center for Management Science, Tech-PSL Research University, MINES Paris, Paris, France.

Monique Ernst (M)

National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Anaïs Osmont (A)

PSYCLE (EA3273), Aix Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France.

Grégoire Borst (G)

Université de Paris, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, Paris, France.
Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

Mathieu Cassotti (M)

Université de Paris, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, Paris, France.
Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH