Effects of a Single Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching Exercise With and Without Post-stretching Activation on the Muscle Function and Mechanical Properties of the Plantar Flexor Muscles.
mechanical properties
muscle function
muscle shear modulus
muscle stiffness
plantar flexor muscles
post-stretching activation
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching
specific warm-up
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
29
06
2021
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
1
10
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2021
medline:
2
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A single proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching exercise can increase the range of motion (ROM) of a joint but can lead to a decrease in performance immediately after the stretching exercise. Post-stretching activation (PSA) exercises are known as a possible way to counteract such a drop in performance following a single stretching exercise. However, to date, no study has investigated the combination of PNF stretching with PSA. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of a PNF stretching exercise with and without PSA on the muscle function (e.g., ROM) and mechanical properties of the plantar flexor muscles. Eighteen physically active males volunteered in the study, which had a crossover design and a random order. The passive shear modulus of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) was measured in a neutral position with shear wave elastography, both pre- and post-intervention. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) peak torque, maximum voluntary dynamic contraction peak torque, dorsiflexion ROM, and passive resistive torque (PRT) were also measured with a dynamometer. The interventions were 4×30s of PNF stretching (5s of contraction) and two sets of three exercises with 20 or 40 fast ground contacts (PNF stretching+PSA) and PNF stretching only. ROM was found to have increased in both groups (+4%). In addition, the PNF stretching+PSA group showed a decrease in PRT at a given angle (-7%) and a decrease in GM and mean shear modulus (GM+GL; -6%). Moreover, the MVIC peak torque decreased (-4%) only in the PNF stretching group (without PSA). Therefore, we conclude that, if PNF stretching is used as a warm-up exercise, target-muscle-specific PSA should follow to keep the performance output at the same level while maintaining the benefit of a greater ROM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34594241
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.732654
pmc: PMC8476946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
732654Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Reiner, Tilp, Guilhem, Morales-Artacho, Nakamura and Konrad.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jun;50(6):1258-1266
pubmed: 29300214
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 21;55(6):1701-18
pubmed: 20197599
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):711-6
pubmed: 20145564
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1999 Aug;20(5-6):433-42
pubmed: 10555062
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44348
pubmed: 22952961
Physiol Rep. 2019 Oct;7(19):e14237
pubmed: 31605467
Can J Appl Physiol. 2001 Jun;26(3):261-72
pubmed: 11441230
J Athl Train. 2005 Jun;40(2):94-103
pubmed: 15970955
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):52-58
pubmed: 32132827
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Apr;86(4):1283-91
pubmed: 10194214
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1528-34
pubmed: 18714235
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1461-1471
pubmed: 33638016
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jan;121(1):67-94
pubmed: 33175242
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004 Apr;51(4):396-409
pubmed: 15139541
Sports Med. 2006;36(11):929-39
pubmed: 17052131
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):195-201
pubmed: 22395281
J Physiol. 2002 Jan 1;538(Pt 1):219-26
pubmed: 11773330
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Jun 01;11(2):279-85
pubmed: 24149201
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1826-31
pubmed: 18815572
Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;90(3):438-49
pubmed: 20075147
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jul;118(7):1427-1445
pubmed: 29721606
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Mar;93(5-6):530-9
pubmed: 15599756
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 May 1;27(3):289-294
pubmed: 28182516
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2015 Jul;43(3):125-33
pubmed: 25906424
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):2991-8
pubmed: 21993032
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Aug;44(8):1512-8
pubmed: 22453249
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Aug;24(3):286-92
pubmed: 25559637
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1597-1604
pubmed: 28138986
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Sep;89(3):1179-88
pubmed: 10956367
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Nov;20(9):973-83
pubmed: 16054737
Physiol Rep. 2017 Aug;5(15):
pubmed: 28801518
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Aug;19(4):553-60
pubmed: 18627559
J Physiol. 1996 Nov 15;497 ( Pt 1):291-8
pubmed: 8951730
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jan 18;:1-7
pubmed: 33331805
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Nov;111(11):2633-51
pubmed: 21373870
J Hum Kinet. 2012 Mar;31:105-13
pubmed: 23487249
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jan;41(1):1-11
pubmed: 26642915
J Anat. 2017 May;230(5):639-650
pubmed: 28251615
Physiol Meas. 2012 Mar;33(3):N19-28
pubmed: 22370174
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2181-90
pubmed: 25668401
J Orthop Res. 2011 Nov;29(11):1759-63
pubmed: 21520263
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Mar 1;35(3):746-753
pubmed: 30024480
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Feb;21(1):223-6
pubmed: 17313299
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1959-1969
pubmed: 28124382
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Oct;27(10):1070-1080
pubmed: 27367916
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Mar;116(3):611-21
pubmed: 26729210