A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models.
Landmarking
Non-Markov multi-state models
Sick leave
The Aalen-Johansen estimator
Transition probabilities
Journal
Lifetime data analysis
ISSN: 1572-9249
Titre abrégé: Lifetime Data Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9516348
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
21
12
2020
accepted:
08
09
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2021
medline:
28
1
2022
entrez:
1
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multi-state models are increasingly being used to model complex epidemiological and clinical outcomes over time. It is common to assume that the models are Markov, but the assumption can often be unrealistic. The Markov assumption is seldomly checked and violations can lead to biased estimation of many parameters of interest. This is a well known problem for the standard Aalen-Johansen estimator of transition probabilities and several alternative estimators, not relying on the Markov assumption, have been suggested. A particularly simple approach known as landmarking have resulted in the Landmark-Aalen-Johansen estimator. Since landmarking is a stratification method a disadvantage of landmarking is data reduction, leading to a loss of power. This is problematic for "less traveled" transitions, and undesirable when such transitions indeed exhibit Markov behaviour. Introducing the concept of partially non-Markov multi-state models, we suggest a hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities. We also show how non-Markov transitions can be identified using a testing procedure. The proposed estimator is a compromise between regular Aalen-Johansen and landmark estimation, using transition specific landmarking, and can drastically improve statistical power. We show that the proposed estimator is consistent, but that the traditional variance estimator can underestimate the variance of both the hybrid and landmark estimator. Bootstrapping is therefore recommended. The methods are compared in a simulation study and in a real data application using registry data to model individual transitions for a birth cohort of 184 951 Norwegian men between states of sick leave, disability, education, work and unemployment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34595580
doi: 10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4
pii: 10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4
pmc: PMC8536588
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
737-760Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Lifetime Data Anal. 2019 Oct;25(4):660-680
pubmed: 30997582
Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):993-1001
pubmed: 11764270
Biometrics. 2002 Jun;58(2):361-8
pubmed: 12071409
Lifetime Data Anal. 1999 Sep;5(3):239-64
pubmed: 10518372
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 11;20(1):206
pubmed: 32781984
Lifetime Data Anal. 2007 Jun;13(2):211-40
pubmed: 17334924
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):2081-2092
pubmed: 29846146
Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Apr;18(2):195-222
pubmed: 18562394
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2389-430
pubmed: 17031868
Biometrics. 2002 Dec;58(4):792-802
pubmed: 12495133
Biometrics. 2015 Jun;71(2):364-75
pubmed: 25735883
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 23;15:1082
pubmed: 26498223
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):556
pubmed: 29699532
Lifetime Data Anal. 2014 Oct;20(4):495-513
pubmed: 23807694
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):1034-41
pubmed: 26148652
Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):91-115
pubmed: 12040698