Acceptability of, and barriers and facilitators to, a pilot physical health service for people who inject drugs: A qualitative study with service users and providers.

Acceptability Barriers and facilitators Drug services Healthcare Implementation People who inject drugs

Journal

The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 25 02 2021
revised: 27 07 2021
accepted: 25 08 2021
pubmed: 3 10 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 2 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

People who inject drugs may experience difficulty accessing or maintaining involvement with traditional healthcare services. This is associated with increased health inequalities and bio-psychosocial difficulties. Embedding physical healthcare services within community-based drug services may provide a practical and feasible approach to increase access and delivery of healthcare. This study explored the acceptability of, and barriers and facilitators to, embedding a pilot physical healthcare service within a community-based drug service in the United Kingdom (Bristol, England). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with service users (people who inject drugs) (n = 13), and a focus group was conducted with service providers (n = 11: nine harm reduction workers, two nurses, one service manager). Topic guides included questions to explore barriers and facilitators to using and delivering the service (based on the COM-B Model), and acceptability of the service (using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability). Transcripts were analysed using a combined deductive framework and inductive thematic analysis approach. The service was viewed as highly acceptable. Service users and providers were confident they could access and provide the service respectively, and perceived it to be effective. Barriers included competing priorities of service users (e.g. drug use) and the wider service (e.g. equipment), and the potential impact of the service being removed in future was viewed as a barrier to overall healthcare access. Both service users and providers viewed embedding the physical health service within an existing community-based drug service as facilitating accessible and holistic care which reduced stigma and discrimination. The current study demonstrated embedding a physical health service within an existing community-drug based and alcohol service was acceptable and beneficial. Future studies are required to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and ensure long-term sustainability, and to determine transferability of findings to other settings, organisations and countries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
People who inject drugs may experience difficulty accessing or maintaining involvement with traditional healthcare services. This is associated with increased health inequalities and bio-psychosocial difficulties. Embedding physical healthcare services within community-based drug services may provide a practical and feasible approach to increase access and delivery of healthcare. This study explored the acceptability of, and barriers and facilitators to, embedding a pilot physical healthcare service within a community-based drug service in the United Kingdom (Bristol, England).
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with service users (people who inject drugs) (n = 13), and a focus group was conducted with service providers (n = 11: nine harm reduction workers, two nurses, one service manager). Topic guides included questions to explore barriers and facilitators to using and delivering the service (based on the COM-B Model), and acceptability of the service (using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability). Transcripts were analysed using a combined deductive framework and inductive thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS
The service was viewed as highly acceptable. Service users and providers were confident they could access and provide the service respectively, and perceived it to be effective. Barriers included competing priorities of service users (e.g. drug use) and the wider service (e.g. equipment), and the potential impact of the service being removed in future was viewed as a barrier to overall healthcare access. Both service users and providers viewed embedding the physical health service within an existing community-based drug service as facilitating accessible and holistic care which reduced stigma and discrimination.
CONCLUSIONS
The current study demonstrated embedding a physical health service within an existing community-drug based and alcohol service was acceptable and beneficial. Future studies are required to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and ensure long-term sustainability, and to determine transferability of findings to other settings, organisations and countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34600415
pii: S0955-3959(21)00342-X
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103437
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pharmaceutical Preparations 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103437

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N00616X/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declarations of Interest None.

Auteurs

Niall C Anderson (NC)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. Electronic address: NiallCAnderson@outlook.com.

Joanna M Kesten (JM)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.

Rachel Ayres (R)

Bristol Drugs Project, Bristol, BS2 8PE, UK.

Matthew Hickman (M)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.

Richard Amlôt (R)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK; Health Protection Agency, Public Health England, Bristol, BS1 6EH, UK; Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Public Health England, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.

Susan Michie (S)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Fabiana Lorencatto (F)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH