DNA methylation profiling identifies two distinct subgroups in breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression, mainly associated with HER2 amplification status.
Journal
Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2021
03 10 2021
Historique:
received:
11
04
2021
accepted:
22
09
2021
entrez:
4
10
2021
pubmed:
5
10
2021
medline:
19
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Current clinical guidelines suggest that breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression (LowHR) in 1-10% of tumor cells should be regarded as hormone receptor positive. However, clinical data show that these patients have worse outcome compared to patients with hormone receptor expression above 10%. We performed DNA methylation profiling on 23 LowHR breast cancer specimens, including 13 samples with HER2 amplification and compared our results with a reference breast cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas to clarify the status for this infrequent but important patient subgroup. In unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction, breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression that lacked HER2 amplification usually clustered with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) reference samples (8/10; "LowHR TNBC-like"). In contrast, most specimens with low hormone receptor expression and HER2 amplification grouped with hormone receptor positive cancers (11/13; "LowHR HRpos-like"). We observed highly similar DNA methylation patterns of LowHR TNBC-like samples and true TNBCs. Furthermore, the Ki67 proliferation index of LowHR TNBC-like samples and clinical outcome parameters were more similar to TNBCs and differed from LowHR HRpos-like cases. We here demonstrate that LowHR breast cancer comprises two epigenetically distinct groups. Our data strongly suggest that LowHR TNBC-like samples are molecularly, histologically and clinically closely related to TNBC, while LowHR HRpos-like specimens are closely related to hormone receptor positive tumors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Current clinical guidelines suggest that breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression (LowHR) in 1-10% of tumor cells should be regarded as hormone receptor positive. However, clinical data show that these patients have worse outcome compared to patients with hormone receptor expression above 10%. We performed DNA methylation profiling on 23 LowHR breast cancer specimens, including 13 samples with HER2 amplification and compared our results with a reference breast cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas to clarify the status for this infrequent but important patient subgroup.
RESULTS
In unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction, breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression that lacked HER2 amplification usually clustered with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) reference samples (8/10; "LowHR TNBC-like"). In contrast, most specimens with low hormone receptor expression and HER2 amplification grouped with hormone receptor positive cancers (11/13; "LowHR HRpos-like"). We observed highly similar DNA methylation patterns of LowHR TNBC-like samples and true TNBCs. Furthermore, the Ki67 proliferation index of LowHR TNBC-like samples and clinical outcome parameters were more similar to TNBCs and differed from LowHR HRpos-like cases.
CONCLUSIONS
We here demonstrate that LowHR breast cancer comprises two epigenetically distinct groups. Our data strongly suggest that LowHR TNBC-like samples are molecularly, histologically and clinically closely related to TNBC, while LowHR HRpos-like specimens are closely related to hormone receptor positive tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34602069
doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01176-5
pii: 10.1186/s13148-021-01176-5
pmc: PMC8489064
doi:
Substances chimiques
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
184Subventions
Organisme : Deutsches Konsortien für Krebsforschung
ID : EPIC G8
Organisme : Deutsche Krebshilfe
ID : INTEGRATE-TN
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;43(10):1855-1861
pubmed: 28756019
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Sep 11;11(509):
pubmed: 31511427
Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 04;6:8971
pubmed: 26634437
Cell Rep. 2018 Jun 12;23(11):3407-3418
pubmed: 29898408
Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1498-506
pubmed: 21837669
Oncol Lett. 2019 Dec;18(6):6690-6696
pubmed: 31807179
Cancer Cell. 2006 Dec;10(6):515-27
pubmed: 17157791
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Nov 04;11(11):
pubmed: 31690011
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 15;344(11):783-92
pubmed: 11248153
Mol Oncol. 2011 Feb;5(1):5-23
pubmed: 21147047
Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 15;79(16):4173-4183
pubmed: 31239270
J Cancer. 2014 Jan 23;5(2):156-65
pubmed: 24563670
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1346-1366
pubmed: 31928404
BMC Cancer. 2006 Apr 18;6:96
pubmed: 16620391
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 May 31;150(1):34-42
pubmed: 29741562
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
pubmed: 15894097
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;37(25):2226-2234
pubmed: 31082269
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 1;30(7):729-34
pubmed: 22291085
Curr Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(2):e106-e114
pubmed: 28490933
Am J Pathol. 2012 Mar;180(3):904-916
pubmed: 22341453
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2420-2428
pubmed: 28961844
Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1736-47
pubmed: 21709140
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 15;32(18):2847-9
pubmed: 27207943
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):747-56
pubmed: 24794243
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;41(1):200-9
pubmed: 22422453
BMC Genomics. 2013 May 01;14:293
pubmed: 23631413
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;28(16):2784-95
pubmed: 20404251