Quality of life in irradiated patients with head and neck cancer: A preliminary study about the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation.
Journal
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
ISSN: 1989-5488
Titre abrégé: J Clin Exp Dent
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101603132
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
4
10
2021
pubmed:
5
10
2021
medline:
5
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Oral quality of life is of great importance in head and neck cancer, where each patient combines functional, social and esthetic needs. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of prosthetic and/or maxillofacial rehabilitation on patients' perceived oral quality of life. The General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used in 28 patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy, recruited at La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France, and who required prosthetic rehabilitation. The questionnaire was completed at three timepoints in the study: before insertion of the prosthesis (T0), then one week (T1) and three months after insertion (T2). The percentage of patients with poor quality of oral health decreased from 96.4% to 64.3% between T0 and T1. Between T0 and T1, the mean score of the psychosocial component of the GOHAI increased from 14.28 ± 4.51 to 20.14 ± 5.20 and the mean functional component score increased from 9.32 ± 3.86 to 12.07 ± 4.04. Prosthetic rehabilitation appeared to have a positive impact on oral quality of life in our study subjects, particularly on social relations and self-esteem. Its influence on pain and discomfort remains to be clarified. This preliminary study gives a prospective view of the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy. Analysis of data yielded by cross-referencing of different questionnaires should make it possible to refine these results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Oral quality of life is of great importance in head and neck cancer, where each patient combines functional, social and esthetic needs. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of prosthetic and/or maxillofacial rehabilitation on patients' perceived oral quality of life.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
The General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used in 28 patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy, recruited at La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France, and who required prosthetic rehabilitation. The questionnaire was completed at three timepoints in the study: before insertion of the prosthesis (T0), then one week (T1) and three months after insertion (T2).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The percentage of patients with poor quality of oral health decreased from 96.4% to 64.3% between T0 and T1. Between T0 and T1, the mean score of the psychosocial component of the GOHAI increased from 14.28 ± 4.51 to 20.14 ± 5.20 and the mean functional component score increased from 9.32 ± 3.86 to 12.07 ± 4.04.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Prosthetic rehabilitation appeared to have a positive impact on oral quality of life in our study subjects, particularly on social relations and self-esteem. Its influence on pain and discomfort remains to be clarified. This preliminary study gives a prospective view of the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy. Analysis of data yielded by cross-referencing of different questionnaires should make it possible to refine these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34603619
doi: 10.4317/jced.58209
pii: 58209
pmc: PMC8464388
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e906-e912Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest Authors report no conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):503-11
pubmed: 15543905
J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Apr;60(2):92-7
pubmed: 26362593
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Mar;22(1):1-11
pubmed: 29388055
Bull Cancer. 2019 Jul - Aug;106(7-8):617-634
pubmed: 30833045
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1993;831:1-122
pubmed: 8351937
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;31 Suppl 1:3-23
pubmed: 15015736
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1123-1130
pubmed: 27277517
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 1;36(3):271-276
pubmed: 29984927
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):1008-19
pubmed: 10071296
Br Dent J. 2009 Dec 12;207(11):E21; discussion 540-1
pubmed: 20010728
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;35(5):357-63
pubmed: 17822484
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(3):199-212
pubmed: 12799323
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S71-S79
pubmed: 28616006
J Dent Educ. 1990 Nov;54(11):680-7
pubmed: 2229624
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;31(4):275-84
pubmed: 12846850
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2000 Spring;18(2):6-11
pubmed: 11153379
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):308-312
pubmed: 32728540
Gerodontology. 2013 Sep;30(3):194-200
pubmed: 22607478
J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Apr;26(4):265-73
pubmed: 10232853