COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-May 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation.

Profession SARS-CoV-2 United States Vaccination Workforce

Journal

Preventive medicine reports
ISSN: 2211-3355
Titre abrégé: Prev Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643766

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 19 05 2021
revised: 13 08 2021
accepted: 19 09 2021
pubmed: 5 10 2021
medline: 5 10 2021
entrez: 4 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy threatens pandemic control efforts. We evaluated vaccine hesitancy in the US by employment status and occupation category during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. US adults 18-64 years completed an online COVID-19 survey 3,179,174 times from January 6-May 19, 2021. Data was aggregated by month. Survey weights matched the sample to the US population age, gender, and state profile. Weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Changes in vaccine hesitancy from January-May varied widely by employment status (e.g., -7.8% [95%CI, -8.2 - -7.5] among those working outside the home, a 26.6% decrease; -13.3% [95%CI, -13.7 - -13.0] among those not working for pay, a 44.9% decrease), and occupation category (e.g., -15.9% [95%CI, -17.7 - -14.2] in production, a 39.3% decrease; -1.4% [95%CI, -3.8 - -1.0] in construction/extraction, a 3.0% decrease). April 20-May 19, 2021, vaccine hesitancy ranged from 7.3% (95%CI, 6.7 - 7.8) in computer/mathematical professions to 45.2% (95%CI, 43.2-46.8) in construction/extraction. Hesitancy was 9.0% (95%CI, 8.6-9.3) among educators and 14.5% (95%CI, 14.0-15.0) among healthcare practitioners/technicians. While the prevalence of reasons for hesitancy differed by occupation, over half of employed hesitant participants reported concern about side effects (51.7%) and not trusting COVID-19 vaccines (51.3%), whereas only 15.0% didn't like vaccines in general. Over a third didn't believe they needed the vaccine, didn't trust the government, and/or were waiting to see if it was safe. In this massive national survey of adults 18-64 years, vaccine hesitancy varied widely by occupation. Reasons for hesitancy indicate messaging about safety and addressing trust are paramount.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34603943
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101569
pii: S2211-3355(21)00259-X
pmc: PMC8474804
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101569

Subventions

Organisme : ACL HHS
ID : U01IP001121
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Références

JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2458-2459
pubmed: 32421155
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jun 25;70(25):928-933
pubmed: 34166337
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33075274
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep;26:100495
pubmed: 32838242
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029058
pubmed: 33301018
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;56(4):397-402
pubmed: 24492538
J Community Health. 2021 Apr;46(2):270-277
pubmed: 33389421
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):e16-e20
pubmed: 33826780
JAMA. 2020 Dec 29;:
pubmed: 33372943
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 21;118(51):
pubmed: 34903656
PLoS Biol. 2020 Nov 12;18(11):e3000897
pubmed: 33180773
BMJ. 2021 May 20;373:n1138
pubmed: 34016653
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):718-724
pubmed: 30711462
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 26;70(8):289-292
pubmed: 33630823
Workplace Health Saf. 2016 Jun;64(6):269-78
pubmed: 27217084
JAMA. 2021 Jun 15;325(23):2397-2399
pubmed: 34028495

Auteurs

Wendy C King (WC)

Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Max Rubinstein (M)

Heinz College and Department of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Alex Reinhart (A)

Department of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Robin Mejia (R)

Department of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH