Health, environmental and distributional impacts of cycling uptake: The model underlying the Propensity to Cycle tool for England and Wales.

Appraisal Carbon Cycling Equity Health impact modelling

Journal

Journal of transport & health
ISSN: 2214-1405
Titre abrégé: J Transp Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101633121

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 27 08 2020
revised: 19 03 2021
accepted: 23 03 2021
entrez: 4 10 2021
pubmed: 5 10 2021
medline: 5 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Propensity to Cycle Tool (PCT) is a widely used free, open source and publicly available tool for modelling cycling uptake and corresponding health and carbon impacts in England and Wales. In this paper we present the methods for our new individual-level modelling representing all commuters in England and Wales. Scenario commuter cycling potential in the PCT is modelled as a function of route distance and hilliness between home and work. Our new individual-level approach has allowed us to create an additional "Near Market" scenario where age, gender, ethnicity, car ownership and area level deprivation also affect an individual's likelihood of switching to cycling. For this and other scenarios, we calculate the carbon benefits of cycling uptake based on the trip distance and previous mode, while health benefits are additionally affected by hilliness and baseline average mortality risk. This allows the estimation of how health and carbon benefits differ by demographic group as well as by scenario. While cycle commuting in England and Wales is demographically skewed towards men and white people, women and people from ethnic minorities have greater cycling potential based on route distance and hilliness. Benefits from cycling uptake are distributed differently again. For example, while increasing female cycling mode share is good for equity, each additional female cyclist generates a smaller average health and carbon benefit than a male cyclist. This is based on women's lower baseline mortality risk, shorter commute travel distances, and lower propensity to commute by car than men. We have demonstrated a new approach to modelling that allows for more sophisticated and nuanced assessment of cycling uptake and subsequent benefits, under different scenarios. Health and carbon are increasingly incorporated into appraisal of active travel schemes, valuing important outcomes. However, especially with better representation of demographic factors, this can act as a barrier to equity goals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34603958
doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101066
pii: S2214-1405(21)00096-7
pmc: PMC8463831
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101066

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 817754
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023187/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P02663X/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Transp Rev. 2017 Jan 2;37(1):29-55
pubmed: 28190905
Inj Prev. 2021 Feb;27(1):71-76
pubmed: 32253257
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Jul;47(1):201-6
pubmed: 468661
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(1):79-83
pubmed: 1505544
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Dec;112(12):4015-25
pubmed: 22446956
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:339-44
pubmed: 26441297
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81
pubmed: 21681120
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e51462
pubmed: 23326315
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14
pubmed: 25900805
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 31;15(7):e1002622
pubmed: 30063716
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2019 Oct;128:149-159
pubmed: 31582879
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:161-170
pubmed: 28969858
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;32(3):235-250
pubmed: 28258521

Auteurs

James Woodcock (J)

University of Cambridge, UK.

Rachel Aldred (R)

University of Westminster, UK.

Robin Lovelace (R)

University of Leeds, UK.

Tessa Strain (T)

University of Cambridge, UK.

Classifications MeSH