Investigating the Use of Dry Matter Intake and Energy Balance Prepartum as Predictors of Digestive Disorders Postpartum.
dairy cows
digestive disorders
dry matter intake
energy balance
predictive models
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
12
2020
accepted:
10
08
2021
entrez:
4
10
2021
pubmed:
5
10
2021
medline:
5
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One objective was to evaluate the association of dry matter intake as a percentage of body weight (DMI%BW) and energy balance (EB) prepartum and postpartum, and energy-corrected milk (ECM) postpatum with digestive disorders postpartum. For this, ANOVA was used, and DMI%BW, EB, and ECM were the outcome variables, and left displaced abomasum (LDA), indigestion, and other digestive disorders (ODDZ) were the explanatory variables. The main objective was to evaluate prepartum DMI%BW and EB as predictors of digestive disorders. For this, logistic regression was used, and LDA, indigestion, and ODDZ were the outcome variables and DMI%BW and EB were the explanatory variables. Data from 689 cows from 11 experiments were compiled. Left displaced abomasum was not associated with prepartum DMI%BW or EB. Postpartum data were normalized to the day of the event (day 0). Cows that developed LDA had lesser postpartum DMI%BW on days -24, -23, -12, -7 to 0 and from days 1 to 8, 10 to 12, and 14 and 16, lesser postpartum EB from days -7 to -5, -3 to 0, and 12, and lesser postpartum energy-corrected milk on days -19, -2, -1, 0, 7, 9, 10, 15, and 17 relative to diagnosis than cows without LDA. Cows that developed indigestion had lesser prepartum DMI%BW and EB than cows without indigestion, and lesser postpartum DMI%BW on days -24, -1, 0, 1, and 2, and greater DMI%BW on day 26, lesser ECM on days -24, -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2 relative to diagnosis. Postpartum EB was not associated with indigestion postpartum. Cows that developed ODDZ had lesser prepartum DMI%BW on day -8 and from days -5 to -2, lesser prepartum EB on day -8 and from days -5 to -2, and lesser postpartum DMI%BW than cows without ODDZ. Each 0.1 percentage point decrease in the average DMI%BW and each Mcal decrease in the average EB in the last 3 days prepartum increased the odds of having indigestion by 9% each. Cutoffs for DMI%BW and EB during the last 3 days prepartum to predict indigestion were established and were ≤1.3%/day and ≤0.68 Mcal/day, respectively. In summary, measures of prepartum DMI%BW and EB were associated with indigestion and ODDZ postpartum and were predictors of indigestion postpartum, although the effect sizes were small.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34604365
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.645252
pmc: PMC8481776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
645252Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Pérez-Báez, Risco, Chebel, Gomes, Greco, Tao, Toledo, do Amaral, Zenobi, Martinez, Dahl, Hernández, Prim, Santos and Galvão.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GG, LG, and NM were employed by the companies Merck Animal Health, Kemin Industries Inc, and Zoetis (United States), respectively. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7426-36
pubmed: 25459905
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Mar;86(3):870-82
pubmed: 12703624
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Feb;97(2):874-87
pubmed: 24359833
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006 Sep 15;113(1-2):21-9
pubmed: 16740320
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Dec;85(12):3430-43
pubmed: 12512616
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5035-5046
pubmed: 22916907
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Jul 09;8:75
pubmed: 22656369
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):9138-9150
pubmed: 31326177
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):5976-86
pubmed: 22118086
J Dairy Sci. 2002 May;85(5):1157-64
pubmed: 12086051
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;251(5):580-586
pubmed: 28828958
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):5682-97
pubmed: 23831093
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3595-601
pubmed: 20655428
J Dairy Sci. 1990 Nov;73(11):3132-40
pubmed: 2273143
J Dairy Res. 2011 Nov;78(4):479-88
pubmed: 21843394
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Mar;89(3):1057-61
pubmed: 16507702
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jul;90(7):3220-33
pubmed: 17582105
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):109-16
pubmed: 19109269
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3247-56
pubmed: 23497992
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Jul;97(7):4127-40
pubmed: 24792805
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1088-1110
pubmed: 29224865
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Dec;95(12):7158-72
pubmed: 23021755
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jan;98(1):229-39
pubmed: 25465552
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Jun;82(6):1188-201
pubmed: 10386305
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):9151-9164
pubmed: 31326169
Res Vet Sci. 1988 Mar;44(2):264-6
pubmed: 3387682
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jan;94(1):86-96
pubmed: 21183020
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2563-2578
pubmed: 29274983
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):2141-57
pubmed: 16702281
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Nov;90(11):5247-58
pubmed: 17954765
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Nov;82(11):2259-73
pubmed: 10575597
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Sep;99(9):7395-7410
pubmed: 27372591
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7547-63
pubmed: 25306269
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):7907-7929
pubmed: 29885896
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Feb;87(2):524-31
pubmed: 14762096
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):5988-99
pubmed: 19923602
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3086-102
pubmed: 20630227
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Jun;82(6):1282-95
pubmed: 10386314
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Mar;86(3):916-25
pubmed: 12703628
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Mar;94(3):1385-400
pubmed: 21338804
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Aug;91(8):3259-67
pubmed: 18650303
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jul;77(7):2044-50
pubmed: 7929964
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2004 Nov;20(3):447-70
pubmed: 15471620
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4595-4614
pubmed: 29550131
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4174-4191
pubmed: 32171515
Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285-93
pubmed: 3287615
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):8224-8235
pubmed: 29935824