Treatment and outcome of intracranial ependymoma after first relapse in the 2nd AIEOP protocol.
1q gain
complete surgery
dissemination
ependymoma relapse
re-irradiation
Journal
Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 03 2022
12 03 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
5
10
2021
medline:
23
3
2022
entrez:
4
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
More than 40% of patients with intracranial ependymoma need a salvage treatment within 5 years after diagnosis, and no standard treatment is available as yet. We report the outcome after first relapse of 64 patients treated within the 2nd AIEOP protocol. We considered relapse sites and treatments, that is, various combinations of complete/incomplete surgery, if followed by standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT). Molecular analyses were available for 38/64 samples obtained at first diagnosis. Of the 64 cases, 55 were suitable for subsequent analyses. The median follow-up was 147 months after diagnosis, 84 months after first relapse, 5-year EFS/OS were 26.2%/30.8% (median EFS/OS 13/32 months) after relapse. For patients with a local relapse (LR), the 5-year cumulative incidence of second LRs was 51.6%, with a 5-year event-specific probability of being LR-free of 40.0%. Tumor site/grade, need for shunting, age above/below 3 years, molecular subgroup at diagnosis, had no influence on outcomes. Due to variation in the RT dose/fractionation used and the subgroup sizes, it was not possible to assess the impact of the different RT modalities. Multivariable analyses identified completion of surgery, the absence of symptoms at relapse, and female sex as prognostically favorable. Tumors with a 1q gain carried a higher cumulative incidence of dissemination after first relapse. Survival after recurrence was significantly influenced by symptoms and completeness of surgery. Only a homogeneous protocol with well-posed, randomized questions could clarify the numerous issues, orient salvage treatment, and ameliorate prognosis for this group of patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
More than 40% of patients with intracranial ependymoma need a salvage treatment within 5 years after diagnosis, and no standard treatment is available as yet. We report the outcome after first relapse of 64 patients treated within the 2nd AIEOP protocol.
METHODS
We considered relapse sites and treatments, that is, various combinations of complete/incomplete surgery, if followed by standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT). Molecular analyses were available for 38/64 samples obtained at first diagnosis. Of the 64 cases, 55 were suitable for subsequent analyses.
RESULTS
The median follow-up was 147 months after diagnosis, 84 months after first relapse, 5-year EFS/OS were 26.2%/30.8% (median EFS/OS 13/32 months) after relapse. For patients with a local relapse (LR), the 5-year cumulative incidence of second LRs was 51.6%, with a 5-year event-specific probability of being LR-free of 40.0%. Tumor site/grade, need for shunting, age above/below 3 years, molecular subgroup at diagnosis, had no influence on outcomes. Due to variation in the RT dose/fractionation used and the subgroup sizes, it was not possible to assess the impact of the different RT modalities. Multivariable analyses identified completion of surgery, the absence of symptoms at relapse, and female sex as prognostically favorable. Tumors with a 1q gain carried a higher cumulative incidence of dissemination after first relapse.
CONCLUSIONS
Survival after recurrence was significantly influenced by symptoms and completeness of surgery. Only a homogeneous protocol with well-posed, randomized questions could clarify the numerous issues, orient salvage treatment, and ameliorate prognosis for this group of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34605902
pii: 6380924
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab230
pmc: PMC8917409
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
467-479Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Jul;52(7):804-7
pubmed: 19260098
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Aug;68(8):e28930
pubmed: 33565268
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:1-7
pubmed: 30825956
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 24;5(1):879
pubmed: 27386327
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jan;133(1):5-12
pubmed: 27858204
Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109
pubmed: 17618441
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Mar 18;21(4):547-557
pubmed: 30452715
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 01;100(2):507-515
pubmed: 29229328
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):974-983
pubmed: 30811284
J Neurooncol. 2017 Oct;135(1):201-211
pubmed: 28733870
Cancer. 2000 Feb 15;88(4):870-5
pubmed: 10679657
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Oct;18(10):1451-60
pubmed: 27194148
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Sep;8(3):246-50
pubmed: 21882914
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 1;71(1):87-97
pubmed: 18406885
Neuro Oncol. 2021 May 5;23(5):848-857
pubmed: 33135735
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Sep;67(9):e28426
pubmed: 32614133
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 May;127(5):731-45
pubmed: 24240813
J Neurooncol. 2019 Sep;144(3):445-452
pubmed: 31502040
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 1;18(7):2001-11
pubmed: 22338015
J Neurooncol. 2012 Jul;108(3):507-12
pubmed: 22437346
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):1541-8
pubmed: 22245198
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jul;45(10):1815-23
pubmed: 19427780
J Neurooncol. 2018 Nov;140(2):457-465
pubmed: 30109673
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1360-1370
pubmed: 33580238
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Aug 22;4(1):88
pubmed: 27550150
Future Oncol. 2018 Dec;14(30):3175-3186
pubmed: 30418040
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Apr;61(4):606-11
pubmed: 24167035
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;23(6):1012-1023
pubmed: 33331885
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 20;24(33):5223-33
pubmed: 17114655
J Neurooncol. 2018 Jun;138(2):435-445
pubmed: 29511977
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Aug;8(8):696-705
pubmed: 17644039