Serological response to nifurtimox in adult patients with chronic Chagas disease: An observational comparative study in Argentina.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
06
05
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
entrez:
4
10
2021
pubmed:
5
10
2021
medline:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nifurtimox is indicated in Chagas disease but determining its effectiveness in chronic disease is hindered by the length of time needed to demonstrate negative serological conversion. We manually reviewed long-term follow-up data from hospital records of patients with chronic Chagas disease (N = 1,497) in Argentina diagnosed during 1967-1980. All patients were aged ≥18 years at diagnosis and were either treated with nifurtimox (n = 968) or received no antitrypanosomal treatment (n = 529). The primary endpoint was negative seroconversion (the "event"), defined as a change from positive to negative in the serological or parasitological laboratory test used at diagnosis. Time to event was from baseline visit to date of endpoint event or censoring. The effectiveness of nifurtimox versus no treatment was estimated with Cox proportional hazard regression using propensity scores with overlap weights to calculate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. The nifurtimox group was younger than the untreated group (mean, 32.4 vs. 40.3 years), with proportionally fewer females (47.9% vs. 60.1%), and proportionally more of the nifurtimox group than the untreated group had clinical signs and symptoms of Chagas disease at diagnosis (28.9% vs. 14.0%). Median maximum daily dose of nifurtimox was 8.0 mg/kg/day (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0-9.0) and median treatment duration was 44 days (IQR: 1-90). Median time to event was 2.1 years (IQR: 1.0-4.5) for nifurtimox-treated and 2.4 years (IQR: 1.0-4.2) for untreated patients. Accounting for potential confounders, the estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for negative seroconversion was 2.22 (1.61-3.07) favoring nifurtimox. Variable treatment regimens and follow-up duration, and an uncommonly high rate of spontaneous negative seroconversion, complicate interpretation of this epidemiological study, but with the longest follow-up and largest cohort analyzed to date it lends weight to the benefit of nifurtimox in adults with chronic Chagas disease. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03784391.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34606501
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009801
pii: PNTD-D-21-00641
pmc: PMC8489720
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Protozoan
0
Trypanocidal Agents
0
Nifurtimox
M84I3K7C2O
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03784391']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0009801Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: David Vizcaya, Ulrike Grossmann, Frank Kleinjung, Ruiping Zhang and Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik are employees of Bayer. Leylen Colmegna is an employee of LAT Research, Argentina. Sandra Seu, Teresa Ramirez and Oscar Ledesma have nothing to disclose.
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 15;51(10):e69-75
pubmed: 20932171
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007 Jan-Feb;40(1):1-10
pubmed: 17486245
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Sep;57(9):4518-23
pubmed: 23836179
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):635-9
pubmed: 24247135
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1997 Mar-Apr;30(2):139-44
pubmed: 9148337
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007 Aug;5(4):717-26
pubmed: 17678432
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2000;57(2):135-62
pubmed: 12934232
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Jun;107(6):372-6
pubmed: 23612468
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Nov;49(5):625-35
pubmed: 8250103
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):724-34
pubmed: 16702588
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2012 Feb;29(1):82-6
pubmed: 22552516
Acta Trop. 2010 Jul-Aug;115(1-2):22-7
pubmed: 19646412
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Nov 20;8(11):e3312
pubmed: 25411847
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2527-34
pubmed: 21714649
Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1407-13
pubmed: 8937280
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jan 7;15(1):e0008912
pubmed: 33412557
Arzneimittelforschung. 1972 Sep;22(9):1624-35
pubmed: 4630485
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-10
pubmed: 26537534
J Trop Med. 2012;2012:292138
pubmed: 22523499
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct;24(4):655-81
pubmed: 21976603
Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1388-402
pubmed: 20399979
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2171-81
pubmed: 18000201
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 05;10(10):e0139363
pubmed: 26436678
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Sep;5(9):e1314
pubmed: 21909451
Nat Med. 2008 May;14(5):542-50
pubmed: 18425131
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Oct;59(4):526-9
pubmed: 9790423
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018 Jul-Aug;51(4):557-559
pubmed: 30133646