Pulsed Wave Doppler Measurements of Maximum Velocity: Dependence on Sample Volume Size.


Journal

Ultrasound in medicine & biology
ISSN: 1879-291X
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410553

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 03 06 2021
revised: 20 08 2021
accepted: 04 09 2021
pubmed: 6 10 2021
medline: 28 1 2022
entrez: 5 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pulsed wave (PW) Doppler ultrasound is routinely used in the clinic to assess blood flow. Our annual Doppler quality assurance tests revealed unexpectedly large errors in measurement of maximum velocity, exceeding our tolerance (error >20%), when using certain scanners with small Doppler sample volume dimensions. The aim of this study was to assess the dependence of maximum velocity estimates on PW Doppler sample volume size. A flow phantom with known steady flow was used to acquire maximum velocity estimates (maximum velocities of 24, 39 and 85 cm/s and sample volume range of 0.3-20 mm) with a variety of transducers and scanners in clinical use (51 probes from 4 manufacturers). Selected acoustic outputs were characterized using free-field hydrophone measurements. All maximum velocity estimates were within our tolerance for sample volume sizes ≥1.5 mm, although maximum velocity estimates typically increased with decreasing sample volume size. Errors exceeding our tolerance were commonly found for one manufacturer when using smaller sample volumes, resulting in up to 75% overestimation. Although intrinsic spectral broadening based on transit time considerations may help explain our findings, the sample volume dependence raises potential clinical concerns that users should be aware of and which manufacturers should consider addressing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34607758
pii: S0301-5629(21)00381-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

68-77

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Simone Ambrogio (S)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Jane Ansell (J)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Elizabeth Gabriel (E)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Grace Aneju (G)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Benedict Newman (B)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Madalina Negoita (M)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Fiammetta Fedele (F)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Kumar V Ramnarine (KV)

Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Kumar.Ramnarine@gstt.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Phantoms, Imaging Radiography Patient Positioning Radiology
Humans Retrospective Studies Female Male Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical
Deep Learning Humans Microvessels Ultrasonography Phantoms, Imaging

Classifications MeSH