Perceptions of safety culture and recording in the operating room: understanding barriers to video data capture.
Anesthesia
Nursing
Obstetrics and gynecology
Safety culture
Surgery
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
05
12
2020
accepted:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
6
10
2021
medline:
14
5
2022
entrez:
5
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recording in the operating room is an important tool to help surgical teams improve their performance. This is becoming more feasible using the Operating Room Black Box, a comprehensive data capture platform. Operating room (OR) staff, however, may voice reasonable concerns as recording initiatives are implemented. The objective of this study was to assess pre-implementation attitudes of OR staff toward operative recording and explore the relationship of these attitudes to the themes of (1) safety culture, (2) impostor syndrome, and (3) privacy concerns. This cross-sectional survey study measured staff members' beliefs and opinions of operative recording and used three previously validated tools (safety attitudes questionnaire, clance impostor phenomenon scale, and dispositional privacy concern) to assess personal and professional factors. Concepts were correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Forty-three staff members participated in this study, with a response rate of 45% (n = 43/96, 20/22 nurses, 9/11 gynecologists, 14/63 anesthesiologists). Opinions of operative data capture were generally positive (5-point Likert scale, mean = 3.81, SD = 0.91). Nurses tended to have more favorable opinions of the OR Black Box as compared to gynecologists and anesthesiologists, though this did not reach statistical significance (4.15 vs. 3.67 vs 3.43, p = 0.06). Impostor syndrome characteristics correlated with concerns about litigation related to recording (r = - 0.32, p = 0.04). There are personal and professional attributes of the OR team that impact perceptions of the OR Black Box and implications around privacy and litigation. Addressing these concerns may facilitate successful implementation of the OR Black Box and improve team communication and patient safety in the OR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34608519
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08695-5
pii: 10.1007/s00464-021-08695-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3789-3797Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Goldenberg MG, Jung J, Grantcharov TP (2017) Using data to enhance performance and improve quality and safety in surgery. JAMA Surg 152(10):972. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888
pubmed: 28813552
Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Gordon LE, Grantcharov TP (2015) Comprehensive surgical coaching enhances surgical skill in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 262(2):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001214
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001214
pubmed: 25822691
Jung JJ, Jüni P, Lebovic G, Grantcharov T (2018) First-year analysis of the operating room black box study. Ann Surg 271:122. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863
Fecso AB, Kuzulugil SS, Babaoglu C, Bener AB, Grantcharov TP (2018) Relationship between intraoperative non-technical performance and technical events in bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 105(8):1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10811
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10811
pubmed: 29601079
van Dalen ASHM, Legemaate J, Schlack WS, Legemate DA, Schijven MP (2019) Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11198
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11198
pubmed: 31879948
pmcid: 7875206
Legassie J, Zibrowski EM, Goldszmidt MA (2008) Measuring resident well-being: impostorism and burnout syndrome in residency. J Gen Intern Med 23(7):1090–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0536-x
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0536-x
pubmed: 18612750
pmcid: 2517942
Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM (2016) Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ 7:364–369. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5801.eac4
doi: 10.5116/ijme.5801.eac4
pubmed: 27802178
pmcid: 5116369
Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB et al (2006) The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 6:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
pubmed: 16584553
pmcid: 1481614
Clance PR, OToole MA (1987) The imposter phenomenon. Women Ther 6(3):51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V06N03_05
doi: 10.1300/J015V06N03_05
Morton A (2013) Measuring inherent privacy concern and desire for privacy: a pilot survey study of an instrument to measure dispositional privacy concern. Proc Soc 2013:468–477. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.73
doi: 10.1109/SocialCom.2013.73
Groß T (2020) Validity and reliability of the scale internet users’ information privacy concern (IUIPC) [extended version]. Proc Priv Enhancing Technol 2:235–258. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2021-0026
doi: 10.2478/popets-2021-0026
Etherington N, Usama A, Patey AM et al (2019) Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the operating room black box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. BMJ Open Qual 8(3):e000686. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000686
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000686
pubmed: 31428707
pmcid: 6683111
Sørensen JL, Lottrup P, van der Vleuten C et al (2014) Unannounced in situ simulation of obstetric emergencies: staff perceptions and organisational impact. Postgrad Med J 90(1069):622–629. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132280
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132280
pubmed: 25210023
Glaser LM, Alvi FA, Milad MP (2017) Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217(3):e1–e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJOG.2017.05.037
doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2017.05.037
Balch CM, Oreskovich MR, Dyrbye LN et al (2011) Personal consequences of malpractice lawsuits on American surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 213(5):657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2011.08.005
doi: 10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2011.08.005
pubmed: 21890381
Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) (2018) Evaluating and implementing quality improvement initiatives in surgery. Safety of care. https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/advice-publications/browse-articles/2018/evaluating-and-implementing-quality-improvement-initiatives-in-surgery . Accessed 11 Sept 2019
Gottlieb M, Chung A, Battaglioli N, Sebok-Syer SS, Kalantari A (2019) Impostor syndrome among physicians and physicians in training: a scoping review. Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13956
doi: 10.1111/medu.13956
pubmed: 31692028
Oriel K, Plane MB, Mundt M (2004) Family medicine residents and the impostor phenomenon. Fam Med 36(4):248–252
pubmed: 15057614
Kamarzarrin H, Khaledian M, et al (2013) A study of the relationship between self-esteem and the imposter phenomenon in the physicians of Rasht city. researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hamid_Kamarzarin/publication/303471104_A_study_of_the_relationship_between_self-esteem_and_the_imposter_phenomenon_in_the_physicians_of_Rasht_city/links/57446ee608ae298602f5ca7c.pdf . Accessed 31 Dec 2019
Ikbaal MY, Salim Musa NA (2018) Prevalence of impostor phenomenon among medical students in a Malaysian Private Medical School. Int J Med Students 6(2):66–70. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2018.10
doi: 10.5195/ijms.2018.10
Mascarenhas VR, D’Souza D, Bicholkar A (2018) Prevalence of impostor phenomenon and its association with self-esteem among medical interns in Goa, India. Int J Community Med Public Health 6(1):355. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20185272
doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20185272
Seritan AL, Mehta MM (2016) Thorny laurels: the impostor phenomenon in academic psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 40(3):418–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0392-z
doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0392-z
pubmed: 26152516
Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H et al (2016) A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 39. Med Teach 38(7):656–668. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663
pubmed: 27146438
Boet S, Bould MD, Layat Burn C, Reeves S (2014) Twelve tips for a successful interprofessional team-based high-fidelity simulation education session. Med Teach 36(10):853–857. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.923558
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.923558
pubmed: 25023765
pmcid: 4245993
Cho YI, Johnson TP, VanGeest JB (2013) Enhancing surveys of health care professionals. Eval Health Prof 36(3):382–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496425
doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425
pubmed: 23975761
Balayla J, Tulandi T (2019) Survey research. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 41(7):901–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.021
doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.021
pubmed: 31227059
Rogelberg SG, Fisher GG, Maynard DC, Hakel MD, Horvath M (2001) Attitudes toward surveys: development of a measure and its relationship to respondent behavior. Organ Res Methods 4(1):3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141001
doi: 10.1177/109442810141001