Primary Care's Effects on Costs in the US Veterans Health Administration, 2016-2019: an Observational Cohort Study.
Veterans Health Administration
health care costs
primary care
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
19
06
2021
accepted:
03
09
2021
pubmed:
6
10
2021
medline:
13
10
2022
entrez:
5
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Enhancing primary care is a promising strategy for improving the efficiency of health care. Previous studies of primary care's effects on health expenditures have mostly relied on ecological analyses comparing region-wide expenditures rather than spending for individual patients. To compare overall medical expenditures for individual patients enrolled vs. those not enrolled in primary care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Cohort study with stratification for clinical risk and multivariable linear regression models adjusted for clinical and demographic confounders of expenditures. In total, 6,009,973 VHA patients in fiscal year (FY) 2019-5,410,034 enrolled with a primary care provider (PCP) and 599,939 without a PCP-and similar numbers in FYs 2016-2018. Total annual cost per patient to the VHA (including VHA payments to non-VHA providers) stratified by a composite health risk score previously shown to predict VHA expenditures, and multivariate models additionally adjusted for VHA regional differences, patients' demographic characteristics, non-VHA insurance coverage, and driving time to the nearest VHA facility. Sensitivity analyses explored different modeling strategies and risk adjusters, as well as the inclusion of expenditures by the Medicare program that covers virtually all elderly VHA patients for care not paid for by the VHA. Within each health-risk decile, non-PCP patients had higher outpatient, inpatient, and total costs than those with a PCP. After adjustment for health risk and other factors, lack of a PCP was associated 27.4% higher VHA expenditures, $3274 per patient annually (p < .0001). Sensitivity analyses using different risk adjusters and including Medicare's spending for VHA patients yielded similar results. In the VHA system, primary care is associated with substantial cost savings. Investments in primary care in other settings might also be cost-effective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Enhancing primary care is a promising strategy for improving the efficiency of health care. Previous studies of primary care's effects on health expenditures have mostly relied on ecological analyses comparing region-wide expenditures rather than spending for individual patients.
OBJECTIVE
To compare overall medical expenditures for individual patients enrolled vs. those not enrolled in primary care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
DESIGN
Cohort study with stratification for clinical risk and multivariable linear regression models adjusted for clinical and demographic confounders of expenditures.
PARTICIPANTS
In total, 6,009,973 VHA patients in fiscal year (FY) 2019-5,410,034 enrolled with a primary care provider (PCP) and 599,939 without a PCP-and similar numbers in FYs 2016-2018.
MAIN MEASURES
Total annual cost per patient to the VHA (including VHA payments to non-VHA providers) stratified by a composite health risk score previously shown to predict VHA expenditures, and multivariate models additionally adjusted for VHA regional differences, patients' demographic characteristics, non-VHA insurance coverage, and driving time to the nearest VHA facility. Sensitivity analyses explored different modeling strategies and risk adjusters, as well as the inclusion of expenditures by the Medicare program that covers virtually all elderly VHA patients for care not paid for by the VHA.
KEY RESULTS
Within each health-risk decile, non-PCP patients had higher outpatient, inpatient, and total costs than those with a PCP. After adjustment for health risk and other factors, lack of a PCP was associated 27.4% higher VHA expenditures, $3274 per patient annually (p < .0001). Sensitivity analyses using different risk adjusters and including Medicare's spending for VHA patients yielded similar results.
CONCLUSIONS
In the VHA system, primary care is associated with substantial cost savings. Investments in primary care in other settings might also be cost-effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34608563
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07140-6
pii: 10.1007/s11606-021-07140-6
pmc: PMC9550907
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3289-3294Informations de copyright
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.
Références
Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(1):111-26
pubmed: 17436988
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
Med Care. 2018 Jun;56(6):537-543
pubmed: 29668647
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 15;20(2):221-6; discussion 227
pubmed: 7716629
J Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;47(2):105-9
pubmed: 9722797
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar 01;22(3):e88-94
pubmed: 26978240
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):766-72
pubmed: 20439859
N Engl J Med. 1971 Jul 15;285(3):148-52
pubmed: 5087704
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1477-81
pubmed: 18592323
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Mar;5:1-14, 1-12
pubmed: 22439245
Health Policy. 2002 Jun;60(3):201-18
pubmed: 11965331
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):775-783
pubmed: 30052548
J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):123-8
pubmed: 8057062
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1676-1683
pubmed: 28323324
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039
pubmed: 29536101
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):356-366
pubmed: 30613955
JAMA. 1995 Jul 26;274(4):305-11
pubmed: 7609259
Am J Public Health. 1989 Jul;79(7):843-6
pubmed: 2660603
Arch Fam Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):487-91
pubmed: 10575386
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):506-514
pubmed: 30776056
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Aug 1;69(8):871-878
pubmed: 29759058
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1709-1711
pubmed: 29091564
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):980-7
pubmed: 24889947
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(3):431-58
pubmed: 7928012
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43
pubmed: 18192044