The trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic and handwashing adherence: findings from 14 countries.
COVID-19
Cross-country
Hand hygiene
Morbidity
Mortality
Pandemic
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2021
05 10 2021
Historique:
received:
11
05
2021
accepted:
16
09
2021
entrez:
6
10
2021
pubmed:
7
10
2021
medline:
9
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people's engagement in health behaviors, especially those that protect individuals from SARS-CoV-2 transmission, such as handwashing/sanitizing. This study investigated whether adherence to the World Health Organization's (WHO) handwashing guidelines (the outcome variable) was associated with the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, as measured by the following 6 indicators: (i) the number of new cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality (a country-level mean calculated for the 14 days prior to data collection), (ii) total cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality accumulated since the onset of the pandemic, and (iii) changes in recent cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality (a difference between country-level COVID-19 morbidity/mortality in the previous 14 days compared to cases recorded 14-28 days earlier). The observational study (#NCT04367337) enrolled 6064 adults residing in Australia, Canada, China, France, Gambia, Germany, Israel, Italy, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, and Switzerland. Data on handwashing adherence across 8 situations (indicated in the WHO guidelines) were collected via an online survey (March-July 2020). Individual-level handwashing data were matched with the date- and country-specific values of the 6 indices of the trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic, obtained from the WHO daily reports. Multilevel regression models indicated a negative association between both accumulation of the total cases of COVID-19 morbidity (B = -.041, SE = .013, p = .013) and mortality (B = -.036, SE = .014 p = .002) and handwashing. Higher levels of total COVID-related morbidity and mortality were related to lower handwashing adherence. However, increases in recent cases of COVID-19 morbidity (B = .014, SE = .007, p = .035) and mortality (B = .022, SE = .009, p = .015) were associated with higher levels of handwashing adherence. Analyses controlled for participants' COVID-19-related situation (their exposure to information about handwashing, being a healthcare professional), sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, marital status), and country-level variables (strictness of containment and health policies, human development index). The models explained 14-20% of the variance in handwashing adherence. To better explain levels of protective behaviors such as handwashing, future research should account for indicators of the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Trials.Gov, # NCT04367337.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people's engagement in health behaviors, especially those that protect individuals from SARS-CoV-2 transmission, such as handwashing/sanitizing. This study investigated whether adherence to the World Health Organization's (WHO) handwashing guidelines (the outcome variable) was associated with the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, as measured by the following 6 indicators: (i) the number of new cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality (a country-level mean calculated for the 14 days prior to data collection), (ii) total cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality accumulated since the onset of the pandemic, and (iii) changes in recent cases of COVID-19 morbidity/mortality (a difference between country-level COVID-19 morbidity/mortality in the previous 14 days compared to cases recorded 14-28 days earlier).
METHODS
The observational study (#NCT04367337) enrolled 6064 adults residing in Australia, Canada, China, France, Gambia, Germany, Israel, Italy, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, and Switzerland. Data on handwashing adherence across 8 situations (indicated in the WHO guidelines) were collected via an online survey (March-July 2020). Individual-level handwashing data were matched with the date- and country-specific values of the 6 indices of the trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic, obtained from the WHO daily reports.
RESULTS
Multilevel regression models indicated a negative association between both accumulation of the total cases of COVID-19 morbidity (B = -.041, SE = .013, p = .013) and mortality (B = -.036, SE = .014 p = .002) and handwashing. Higher levels of total COVID-related morbidity and mortality were related to lower handwashing adherence. However, increases in recent cases of COVID-19 morbidity (B = .014, SE = .007, p = .035) and mortality (B = .022, SE = .009, p = .015) were associated with higher levels of handwashing adherence. Analyses controlled for participants' COVID-19-related situation (their exposure to information about handwashing, being a healthcare professional), sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, marital status), and country-level variables (strictness of containment and health policies, human development index). The models explained 14-20% of the variance in handwashing adherence.
CONCLUSIONS
To better explain levels of protective behaviors such as handwashing, future research should account for indicators of the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical Trials.Gov, # NCT04367337.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34610808
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11822-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11822-5
pmc: PMC8492037
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04367337']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1791Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):30-33
pubmed: 32818577
Curr Psychol. 2021 Jun 17;:1-10
pubmed: 34155429
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):1032-53
pubmed: 18954213
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538
pubmed: 33686204
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Feb 12;55(1):82-88
pubmed: 33301024
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 16;13:92
pubmed: 23855337
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):
pubmed: 32674285
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742
pubmed: 33047037
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233875
pubmed: 32469989
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 08;17(18):
pubmed: 32911779
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e21597
pubmed: 32960775
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Sep 1;54(9):619-625
pubmed: 32856691
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):12
pubmed: 33397344
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;11(4):
pubmed: 33920791
Proc Nutr Soc. 2008 Aug;67(3):307-16
pubmed: 18700052
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):981-1005
pubmed: 32780891
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Oct 12;36Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e00193920
pubmed: 33053062
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 04;18(11):
pubmed: 34199908
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113370
pubmed: 32980677
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0243695
pubmed: 33306718
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):767-770
pubmed: 32598162
BMJ. 2021 Jan 18;372:n137
pubmed: 33461963
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Oct 1;54(10):713-727
pubmed: 32914831
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:582720
pubmed: 33329239
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):
pubmed: 32872179