Global Analysis of Research Trends on Kidney Function After Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A Bibliometric and Visualised Study.
Scopus
bibliometric
kidney function
nephron-sparing surgery
partial nephrectomy
renal insufficiency
Journal
Cancer management and research
ISSN: 1179-1322
Titre abrégé: Cancer Manag Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101512700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
06
2021
accepted:
18
09
2021
entrez:
6
10
2021
pubmed:
7
10
2021
medline:
7
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for small renal masses (SRMs) is currently the standard of care to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The concept of partial resection of RCC has mainly been developed to preserve kidney function. Therefore, we have performed this study to explore the research activity that has been undertaken since the early twenty-first century to investigate the advantages of NSS on preserving kidney function and preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Based on the Scopus database, this bibliometric study was used to reveal publication patterns in the kidney function and NSS research field. The data were analysed with VOSviewer version 1.6.16 software, which was used to create a network visualisation map that included research hotspots in this area. A total of 449 scientific publications focused on renal function in NSS between 2001 and 2020. One hundred and seventy (38%) of the total published articles originated from the USA. NSS for SRMs and RCC and its impact on kidney function is a hot topic in the literature, and the amount of published data has consistently been rising since 2000. However, even though hundreds of documents have studied this topic from various perspectives, there is a compelling need to answer several questions such as the overall survival (OS) benefit of performing NSS in localised RCC and head-to-head comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic NSS in terms of warm ischemia time and long-term decline in GFR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for small renal masses (SRMs) is currently the standard of care to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The concept of partial resection of RCC has mainly been developed to preserve kidney function. Therefore, we have performed this study to explore the research activity that has been undertaken since the early twenty-first century to investigate the advantages of NSS on preserving kidney function and preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS
METHODS
Based on the Scopus database, this bibliometric study was used to reveal publication patterns in the kidney function and NSS research field. The data were analysed with VOSviewer version 1.6.16 software, which was used to create a network visualisation map that included research hotspots in this area.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 449 scientific publications focused on renal function in NSS between 2001 and 2020. One hundred and seventy (38%) of the total published articles originated from the USA.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
NSS for SRMs and RCC and its impact on kidney function is a hot topic in the literature, and the amount of published data has consistently been rising since 2000. However, even though hundreds of documents have studied this topic from various perspectives, there is a compelling need to answer several questions such as the overall survival (OS) benefit of performing NSS in localised RCC and head-to-head comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic NSS in terms of warm ischemia time and long-term decline in GFR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34611441
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S324284
pii: 324284
pmc: PMC8485850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
7479-7487Informations de copyright
© 2021 Abushamma et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.
Références
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jan;34(1):24-32
pubmed: 26254695
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Aug;73(4):509-517
pubmed: 33887896
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):863-6
pubmed: 15310984
Scientometrics. 2010 Aug;84(2):523-538
pubmed: 20585380
Curr Urol. 2013 Jan;6(3):129-35
pubmed: 24917730
BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):377-83
pubmed: 15679798
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Oct;14(10):337-345
pubmed: 32432530
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):55-61; discussion 61-2
pubmed: 19012918
Cancer Treat Res. 2018;175:105-126
pubmed: 30168119
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529
pubmed: 28479239
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):51-7
pubmed: 22591957
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):473-9
pubmed: 20006866
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):209-215
pubmed: 31411993
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):774-780
pubmed: 33678521
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):1889-98
pubmed: 25637858
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):543-52
pubmed: 21186077
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Mar;53(3):393-400
pubmed: 32980930
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):344-353
pubmed: 30309817
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 16;18(1):210
pubmed: 32799867
J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):68-71
pubmed: 14665846
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8
pubmed: 19232819
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):405-10
pubmed: 21680004
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):561
pubmed: 32738881
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Aug 3;5:37
pubmed: 32775695
Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053-1070
pubmed: 28490825
BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):787-95
pubmed: 24905965
Urology. 2002 Jun;59(6):816-20
pubmed: 12031359
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):372-7
pubmed: 23850254
Eur Urol. 2009 Oct;56(4):625-34
pubmed: 19656615
Heart Fail Rev. 2015 May;20(3):259-72
pubmed: 25344016
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):421-7
pubmed: 21167524
Int J Urol. 2012 Nov;19(11):980-6
pubmed: 22735049
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1247-53
pubmed: 21849201
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):891-901
pubmed: 25572825
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):356-60
pubmed: 22310752
Cancer. 2008 Feb 1;112(3):511-20
pubmed: 18072263
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 7;27(13):1341-1353
pubmed: 33833487
J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2181-5, quiz 2435
pubmed: 15126781
BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):692-705
pubmed: 27409986
Global Health. 2020 Jul 28;16(1):68
pubmed: 32723366
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):265-71
pubmed: 23783881
Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug;31(6):924-9
pubmed: 21906969
J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1649-55
pubmed: 23201493
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):235-41
pubmed: 23567066