Why did some parents not send their children back to school following school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.


Journal

BMJ paediatrics open
ISSN: 2399-9772
Titre abrégé: BMJ Paediatr Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101715309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 12 2020
accepted: 15 05 2021
entrez: 6 10 2021
pubmed: 7 10 2021
medline: 7 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

On 23 March 2020, schools closed to most children in England in response to COVID-19 until September 2020. Schools were kept open to children of key workers and vulnerable children on a voluntary basis. Starting 1 June 2020, children in reception (4-5 years old), year 1 (5-6 years old) and year 6 (10-11 years old) also became eligible to attend school. 1373 parents or guardians of children eligible to attend school completed a cross-sectional survey between 8 and 11 June 2020. We investigated factors associated with whether children attended school or not. 46% (n=370/803) of children in year groups eligible to attend school and 13% (n=72/570) of children of key workers had attended school in the past 7 days. The most common reasons for sending children to school were that the child's education would benefit, the child wanted to go to school and the parent needed to work. A child was significantly more likely to attend if the parent believed the child had already had COVID-19, they had special educational needs or a person in the household had COVID-19 symptoms. Following any future school closure, helping parents to feel comfortable returning their child to school will require policy makers and school leaders to communicate about the adequacy of their policies to: (A) ensure that the risk to children in school is minimised; (B) ensure that the educational potential within schools is maximised; and (C) ensure that the benefits of school for the psychological well-being of children are prioritised.

Sections du résumé

Background
On 23 March 2020, schools closed to most children in England in response to COVID-19 until September 2020. Schools were kept open to children of key workers and vulnerable children on a voluntary basis. Starting 1 June 2020, children in reception (4-5 years old), year 1 (5-6 years old) and year 6 (10-11 years old) also became eligible to attend school.
Methods
1373 parents or guardians of children eligible to attend school completed a cross-sectional survey between 8 and 11 June 2020. We investigated factors associated with whether children attended school or not.
Results
46% (n=370/803) of children in year groups eligible to attend school and 13% (n=72/570) of children of key workers had attended school in the past 7 days. The most common reasons for sending children to school were that the child's education would benefit, the child wanted to go to school and the parent needed to work. A child was significantly more likely to attend if the parent believed the child had already had COVID-19, they had special educational needs or a person in the household had COVID-19 symptoms.
Conclusions
Following any future school closure, helping parents to feel comfortable returning their child to school will require policy makers and school leaders to communicate about the adequacy of their policies to: (A) ensure that the risk to children in school is minimised; (B) ensure that the educational potential within schools is maximised; and (C) ensure that the benefits of school for the psychological well-being of children are prioritised.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34611551
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-001014
pii: bmjpo-2020-001014
pmc: PMC8482536
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

e001014

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827
pubmed: 32758453
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):397-404
pubmed: 32272089
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Aug;38(8):835-55
pubmed: 10937431
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):205-11
pubmed: 20113548
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;4(6):421
pubmed: 32302537
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Dec;12:100651
pubmed: 33072839
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;39(2):173-85
pubmed: 20878460
Euro Surveill. 2020 Sep;25(38):
pubmed: 32975186
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(13):
pubmed: 32265006
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240399
pubmed: 33147219
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(21):
pubmed: 32489179
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Sep 9;4(1):e000825
pubmed: 34192178
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Nov;7(6):1308-15
pubmed: 23176127
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2018 Oct 01;9(5 Suppl 1):27-34
pubmed: 31832251
Psychol Health. 2021 Feb;36(2):179-194
pubmed: 32762551

Auteurs

Lisa Woodland (L)

Institution of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Louise E Smith (LE)

Institution of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Rebecca K Webster (RK)

Psychology Deparment, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Richard Amlôt (R)

Public Health England, Salisbury, UK.

Antonia Rubin (A)

Weald of Kent Grammar School, Tonbridge, UK.

Simon Wessely (S)

Institution of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

James G Rubin (JG)

Institution of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH