B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ therapeutic use
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ pharmacology
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ pharmacology
B-Lymphocytes
/ drug effects
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Lupus Nephritis
/ drug therapy
Male
Mycophenolic Acid
/ therapeutic use
Placebos
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
lupus erythematosus
lupus nephritis
rituximab
systemic
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
03
06
2021
accepted:
28
07
2021
pubmed:
8
10
2021
medline:
15
2
2022
entrez:
7
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Randomised trials of type I anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and ocrelizumab failed to show benefit in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). We compared obinutuzumab, a humanised type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces potent B-cell depletion, with placebo for the treatment of LN in combination with standard therapies. Patients with LN receiving mycophenolate and corticosteroids were randomised to obinutuzumab 1000 mg or placebo on day 1 and weeks 2, 24 and 26, and followed through week 104. The primary endpoint was complete renal response (CRR) at week 52. Exploratory analyses through week 104 were conducted. The prespecified alpha level was 0.2. A total of 125 patients were randomised and received blinded infusions. Achievement of CRR was greater with obinutuzumab at week 52 (primary endpoint, 22 (35%) vs 14 (23%) with placebo; percentage difference, 12% (95% CI -3.4% to 28%), p=0.115) and at week 104 (26 (41%) vs 14 (23%); percentage difference, 19% (95% CI 2.7% to 35%), p=0.026). Improvements in other renal response measures, serologies, estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria were greater with obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab was not associated with increases in serious adverse events, serious infections or deaths. Non-serious infusion-related reactions occurred more frequently with obinutuzumab. Improved renal responses through week 104 were observed in patients with LN who received obinutuzumab plus standard therapies compared with standard therapies alone. Obinutuzumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified. NCT02550652.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34615636
pii: annrheumdis-2021-220920
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220920
pmc: PMC8762029
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Placebos
0
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
obinutuzumab
O43472U9X8
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02550652']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100-107Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RAF reports personal fees from Genentech/Roche during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work and grants from Genentech/Roche. MDC and JPG are employees and shareholders of Genentech/Roche. BHR reports personal fees from Genentech, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Aurinia, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Mallinckrodt, personal fees from EMD Serono, personal fees from Omeros, personal fees from Calliditas, personal fees from Retrophin, personal fees from BioMarin, outside the submitted work. PB was an employee and shareholder of Genentech during the design and enrolment period. TS and IH are employees and shareholders of Roche. GA, AA, HF-L, EZ-S and AM have nothing to disclose.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):1117-1128
pubmed: 32937045
Lupus Sci Med. 2015 Nov 12;2(1):e000123
pubmed: 26629352
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1829-1836
pubmed: 28684557
Kidney Int. 2004 Feb;65(2):521-30
pubmed: 14717922
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jun;64(6):797-808
pubmed: 22556106
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Apr;61(4):934-939
pubmed: 31842643
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 May;73(5):826-836
pubmed: 33277983
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 20;370(12):1101-10
pubmed: 24401022
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Sep;8(9):505-14
pubmed: 22801948
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Oct;12(10):2031-42
pubmed: 23873847
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb;48(2):455-9
pubmed: 12571855
J Immunol. 2011 Oct 1;187(7):3888-94
pubmed: 21873531
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):1502-1509
pubmed: 30089664
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):252-62
pubmed: 26342222
Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2070-2080
pubmed: 33971155
Blood. 2015 Dec 10;126(24):2646-9
pubmed: 26447188
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(8):2046-55
pubmed: 25916583
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745
pubmed: 30926722
Blood. 2010 Jun 3;115(22):4393-402
pubmed: 20194898
Blood. 2015 Mar 19;125(12):1901-9
pubmed: 25631769
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jul 1;56(7):1227-1237
pubmed: 28407142
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1331-1344
pubmed: 28976863
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725
pubmed: 9324032
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Sep;65(9):2368-79
pubmed: 23740801
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):3038-47
pubmed: 21618204
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;68(6):1432-41
pubmed: 26815601
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1305-13
pubmed: 25605554
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):1215-26
pubmed: 22231479
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):243
pubmed: 22078750
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):3035-3045
pubmed: 31257724