Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase by nucleotide analogs from a single-molecule perspective.
Adenosine Monophosphate
/ analogs & derivatives
Alanine
/ analogs & derivatives
Antiviral Agents
/ pharmacology
Cell Line
Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
High-Throughput Screening Assays
/ methods
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Nucleotides
/ metabolism
RNA, Viral
SARS-CoV-2
/ drug effects
Stochastic Processes
Virus Replication
/ drug effects
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Remdesivir
SARS-CoV-2
antiviral drugs
high throughput magnetic tweezers
infectious disease
mechanism of action
microbiology
physics of living systems
single molecule biophysics
virus
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 10 2021
07 10 2021
Historique:
received:
03
06
2021
accepted:
24
08
2021
entrez:
7
10
2021
pubmed:
8
10
2021
medline:
14
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The absence of 'shovel-ready' anti-coronavirus drugs during vaccine development has exceedingly worsened the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Furthermore, new vaccine-resistant variants and coronavirus outbreaks may occur in the near future, and we must be ready to face this possibility. However, efficient antiviral drugs are still lacking to this day, due to our poor understanding of the mode of incorporation and mechanism of action of nucleotides analogs that target the coronavirus polymerase to impair its essential activity. Here, we characterize the impact of remdesivir (RDV, the only FDA-approved anti-coronavirus drug) and other nucleotide analogs (NAs) on RNA synthesis by the coronavirus polymerase using a high-throughput, single-molecule, magnetic-tweezers platform. We reveal that the location of the modification in the ribose or in the base dictates the catalytic pathway(s) used for its incorporation. We show that RDV incorporation does not terminate viral RNA synthesis, but leads the polymerase into backtrack as far as 30 nt, which may appear as termination in traditional ensemble assays. SARS-CoV-2 is able to evade the endogenously synthesized product of the viperin antiviral protein, ddhCTP, though the polymerase incorporates this NA well. This experimental paradigm is essential to the discovery and development of therapeutics targeting viral polymerases. To multiply and spread from cell to cell, the virus responsible for COVID-19 (also known as SARS-CoV-2) must first replicate its genetic information. This process involves a ‘polymerase’ protein complex making a faithful copy by assembling a precise sequence of building blocks, or nucleotides. The only drug approved against SARS-CoV-2 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), remdesivir, consists of a nucleotide analog, a molecule whose structure is similar to the actual building blocks needed for replication. If the polymerase recognizes and integrates these analogs into the growing genetic sequence, the replication mechanism is disrupted, and the virus cannot multiply. Most approaches to study this process seem to indicate that remdesivir works by stopping the polymerase and terminating replication altogether. Yet, exactly how remdesivir and other analogs impair the synthesis of new copies of the virus remains uncertain. To explore this question, Seifert, Bera et al. employed an approach called magnetic tweezers which uses a magnetic field to manipulate micro-particles with great precision. Unlike other methods, this technique allows analogs to be integrated under conditions similar to those found in cells, and to be examined at the level of a single molecule. The results show that contrary to previous assumptions, remdesivir does not terminate replication; instead, it causes the polymerase to pause and backtrack (which may appear as termination in other techniques). The same approach was then applied to other nucleotide analogs, some of which were also found to target the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. However, these analogs are incorporated differently to remdesivir and with less efficiency. They also obstruct the polymerase in distinct ways. Taken together, the results by Seifert, Bera et al. suggest that magnetic tweezers can be a powerful approach to reveal how analogs interfere with replication. This information could be used to improve currently available analogs as well as develop new antiviral drugs that are more effective against SARS-CoV-2. This knowledge will be key at a time when treatments against COVID-19 are still lacking, and may be needed to protect against new variants and future outbreaks.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
To multiply and spread from cell to cell, the virus responsible for COVID-19 (also known as SARS-CoV-2) must first replicate its genetic information. This process involves a ‘polymerase’ protein complex making a faithful copy by assembling a precise sequence of building blocks, or nucleotides. The only drug approved against SARS-CoV-2 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), remdesivir, consists of a nucleotide analog, a molecule whose structure is similar to the actual building blocks needed for replication. If the polymerase recognizes and integrates these analogs into the growing genetic sequence, the replication mechanism is disrupted, and the virus cannot multiply. Most approaches to study this process seem to indicate that remdesivir works by stopping the polymerase and terminating replication altogether. Yet, exactly how remdesivir and other analogs impair the synthesis of new copies of the virus remains uncertain. To explore this question, Seifert, Bera et al. employed an approach called magnetic tweezers which uses a magnetic field to manipulate micro-particles with great precision. Unlike other methods, this technique allows analogs to be integrated under conditions similar to those found in cells, and to be examined at the level of a single molecule. The results show that contrary to previous assumptions, remdesivir does not terminate replication; instead, it causes the polymerase to pause and backtrack (which may appear as termination in other techniques). The same approach was then applied to other nucleotide analogs, some of which were also found to target the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. However, these analogs are incorporated differently to remdesivir and with less efficiency. They also obstruct the polymerase in distinct ways. Taken together, the results by Seifert, Bera et al. suggest that magnetic tweezers can be a powerful approach to reveal how analogs interfere with replication. This information could be used to improve currently available analogs as well as develop new antiviral drugs that are more effective against SARS-CoV-2. This knowledge will be key at a time when treatments against COVID-19 are still lacking, and may be needed to protect against new variants and future outbreaks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34617885
doi: 10.7554/eLife.70968
pii: 70968
pmc: PMC8497053
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Nucleotides
0
RNA, Viral
0
remdesivir
3QKI37EEHE
Adenosine Monophosphate
415SHH325A
Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase
EC 2.7.7.48
Alanine
OF5P57N2ZX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P01 GM118303
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R21 AI149295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI161841
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI045818
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001439
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI158463
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI134907
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI151638
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R00 AI123498
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K99 AI123498
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
© 2021, Seifert et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MS, SB, Pv, RK, AS, TL, XM, HX, JW, LH, FP, JA, SA, TG, PS, YX, BC, MD, CC, DD No competing interests declared
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jun 4;48(10):5591-5602
pubmed: 32286652
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1003030
pubmed: 23166498
Cell Rep. 2021 Aug 31;36(9):109650
pubmed: 34433083
J Proteome Res. 2020 Nov 6;19(11):4690-4697
pubmed: 32692185
J Med Chem. 2017 Mar 9;60(5):1648-1661
pubmed: 28124907
PLoS Pathog. 2013 Aug;9(8):e1003565
pubmed: 23966862
J Virol. 2020 Nov 9;94(23):
pubmed: 32938769
Curr Opin Virol. 2019 Apr;35:57-62
pubmed: 31125806
Biochemistry. 2004 May 11;43(18):5149-58
pubmed: 15122880
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4682
pubmed: 32943628
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 11;118(19):
pubmed: 33883267
iScience. 2020 Dec 18;23(12):101849
pubmed: 33283177
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Dec 16;47(22):e144
pubmed: 31584079
Antiviral Res. 2020 Aug;180:104857
pubmed: 32562705
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 9;115(2):E162-E171
pubmed: 29279395
Mol Cell. 2020 Sep 3;79(5):710-727
pubmed: 32853546
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2014 Dec 08;7:387-98
pubmed: 25540594
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015 Oct;34:116-22
pubmed: 26434413
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):154-156
pubmed: 32438371
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):610-614
pubmed: 29925952
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):5874
pubmed: 33208736
J Virol. 2007 Nov;81(22):12135-44
pubmed: 17804504
Science. 2021 Sep 3;373(6559):1142-1146
pubmed: 34315827
Nat Commun. 2019 May 28;10(1):2342
pubmed: 31138817
J Biol Chem. 2020 Jul 24;295(30):10112-10124
pubmed: 32457046
mBio. 2018 Mar 6;9(2):
pubmed: 29511076
Mol Cell. 2021 Apr 1;81(7):1548-1552.e4
pubmed: 33631104
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 07;10:1813
pubmed: 31440227
J Biol Chem. 2020 Apr 10;295(15):4773-4779
pubmed: 32094225
Cell Host Microbe. 2020 May 13;27(5):841-848.e3
pubmed: 32289263
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):279
pubmed: 33436624
Cell Rep. 2017 Oct 24;21(4):1063-1076
pubmed: 29069588
Cell Rep. 2015 Feb 17;10(6):983-992
pubmed: 25683720
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Dec 2;43(21):10421-9
pubmed: 26496948
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 15;11(1):5214
pubmed: 33060595
Cell Rep. 2020 Oct 6;33(1):108234
pubmed: 32979938
Science. 2020 May 15;368(6492):779-782
pubmed: 32277040
J Med Chem. 2010 Oct 14;53(19):7202-18
pubmed: 20845908
Rev Sci Instrum. 2014 Oct;85(10):103712
pubmed: 25362408
Mol Cell Biochem. 1994 Nov 9;140(1):1-22
pubmed: 7877593
Cell Rep. 2020 Jul 21;32(3):107940
pubmed: 32668216
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111(37):E3900-9
pubmed: 25197083
Cell. 2020 Jul 23;182(2):417-428.e13
pubmed: 32526208
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 12;109(24):9372-7
pubmed: 22635272
J Biol Chem. 2020 May 15;295(20):6785-6797
pubmed: 32284326
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 29;8(1):15920
pubmed: 30374099
Antiviral Res. 2009 Jun;82(3):95-102
pubmed: 19428599
Cell. 2020 Sep 17;182(6):1560-1573.e13
pubmed: 32783916