Particulated Juvenile Articular Cartilage and Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Are Cost-Effective for Patellar Chondral Lesions.


Journal

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2022
Historique:
received: 09 03 2021
revised: 20 08 2021
accepted: 21 08 2021
pubmed: 8 10 2021
medline: 6 4 2022
entrez: 7 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the cost-effectiveness of nonoperative management, particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (PJAC), and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) in the management of patellar chondral lesions. A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for symptomatic patellar chondral lesions: 1) nonoperative management, 2) PJAC, and 3) MACI. Model inputs (transition probabilities, utilities, and costs) were derived from literature review and an institutional cohort of 67 patients treated with PJAC for patellar chondral defects (mean age 26 years, mean lesion size 2.7 cm From a societal perspective, nonoperative management, PJAC, and MACI cost $4,140, $52,683, and $83,073 and were associated with 5.28, 7.22, and 6.92 QALYs gained, respectively. PJAC and MACI were cost-effective relative to nonoperative management (ICERs $25,010/QALY and $48,344/QALY, respectively). PJAC dominated MACI in the base case analysis by being cheaper and more effective, but this was sensitive to the estimated effectiveness of both strategies. PJAC remained cost-effective if PJAC and MACI were considered equally effective. In the management of symptomatic patellar cartilage defects, PJAC and MACI were both cost-effective compared to nonoperative management. Because of the need for one surgery instead of two, and less costly graft material, PJAC was cheaper than MACI. Consequently, when PJAC and MACI were considered equally effective, PJAC was more cost-effective than MACI. Sensitivity analyses accounting for the lack of robust long-term data for PJAC or MACI demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of PJAC versus MACI depended heavily on the relative probabilities of yielding similar clinical results. III, economic and decision analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34619304
pii: S0749-8063(21)00815-X
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.038
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1252-1263.e3

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Drake G LeBrun (DG)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York. Electronic address: lebrundr@hss.edu.

Benedict U Nwachukwu (BU)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Stephanie S Buza (SS)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Simone Gruber (S)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

William A Marmor (WA)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Elizabeth R Dennis (ER)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Beth E Shubin Stein (BE)

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH