Vibration Propagation on the Skin of the Arm.
upper extremity
user feedback
vibration propagation
vibrotactile displays
Journal
Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-3417
Titre abrégé: Appl Sci (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101633495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2019
02 Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez:
8
10
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2019
medline:
2
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vibrotactile interfaces are an inexpensive and non-invasive way to provide performance feedback to body-machine interface users. Interfaces for the upper extremity have utilized a multi-channel approach using an array of vibration motors placed on the upper extremity. However, for successful perception of multi-channel vibrotactile feedback on the arm, we need to account for vibration propagation across the skin. If two stimuli are delivered within a small distance, mechanical propagation of vibration can lead to inaccurate perception of the distinct vibrotactile stimuli. This study sought to characterize vibration propagation across the hairy skin of the forearm. We characterized vibration propagation by measuring accelerations at various distances from a source vibration of variable intensities (100-240 Hz). Our results showed that acceleration from the source vibration was present at a distance of 4 cm at intensities >150 Hz. At distances greater than 8 cm from the source, accelerations were reduced to values substantially below vibrotactile discrimination thresholds for all vibration intensities. We conclude that in future applications of vibrotactile interfaces, stimulation sites should be separated by a distance of at least 8 cm to avoid potential interference in vibration perception caused by propagating vibrations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34621542
doi: 10.3390/app9204329
pmc: PMC8493869
mid: NIHMS1601484
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD053727
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R15 HD093086
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
Haptics (2018). 2018 Jun;10893:3-14
pubmed: 31179445
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Jul 20;12:59
pubmed: 26188929
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 24;27(43):11687-99
pubmed: 17959811
Hum Factors. 2011 Dec;53(6):600-11
pubmed: 22235523
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jul 1;122(1):22-38
pubmed: 30995149
Hum Factors. 2008 Feb;50(1):90-111
pubmed: 18354974
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 Jan;38(1):1-16
pubmed: 2026426
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 2;14(1):36
pubmed: 28464891
J Neurophysiol. 1972 Jan;35(1):122-36
pubmed: 4621505
Phys Ther. 1982 Jul;62(7):965-9
pubmed: 7089059
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Aug;11(4):455-61
pubmed: 11502392
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2007;:48937
pubmed: 18354734
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2013 Jul-Sep;6(3):320-9
pubmed: 24808328
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Oct;65(7):1058-77
pubmed: 14674633
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31203
pubmed: 22348055
Neurosci Lett. 1989 Sep 25;104(1-2):130-5
pubmed: 2812525
J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283-300
pubmed: 439026
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Aug;237(8):2075-2086
pubmed: 31175382
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975337
pubmed: 22275542
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 2;1102(1):109-16
pubmed: 16806126
J Mot Behav. 2012;44(6):419-33
pubmed: 23237465
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 Jan;38(1):74-9
pubmed: 10829394
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):186
pubmed: 28645533
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Nov;84(5):1680-94
pubmed: 3209773
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Feb;59(2):400-8
pubmed: 22042125