Long-term follow-up after successful treatment of vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia.

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Long-term follow-up PF4 antibody levels Successful treatment Vaccine induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia

Journal

Thrombosis research
ISSN: 1879-2472
Titre abrégé: Thromb Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0326377

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 16 08 2021
revised: 15 09 2021
accepted: 24 09 2021
pubmed: 9 10 2021
medline: 9 10 2021
entrez: 8 10 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cases of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccinated patients with thrombocytopenia, elevated D-dimer, and elevated platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody levels with- and without thrombosis have been reported. No recommendations regarding the duration of anticoagulation have been made, because data on the long-term course beyond the first weeks is lacking. To report on the treatment, medical course, and longitudinal follow-up of laboratory parameters in patients with vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT). We followed VIPIT patients with- (n = 3) and without (n = 3) venous thromboembolism fulfilling the aforementioned laboratory criteria. Elevated D-dimer (median: 35.10 μg/ml, range: 17.80-52.70), thrombocytopenia (42 G/l, 20-101), and strong positivity in the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-enzyme-immunoassay (2.42 optical density [OD], 2.06-3.13; reference range < 0.50) were present in all patients after vaccination (10 days, 7-17). Routine laboratory parameters rapidly improved upon initiation of treatment (comprising therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation in all patients and high dose immunoglobulins ± corticosteroids in 5 patients). PF4 antibody levels slowly decreased over several weeks. Patients were discharged in good physical health (8 days, 5-13). VIPIT did not recur during follow-up (12 weeks, 8-17). Five of 6 patients fully recovered (in 2 patients thrombosis had resolved, in 1 patient exertional dyspnea persisted). Remissions without sequelae can be achieved upon rapid initiation of treatment in patients with VIPIT. Platelet factor 4 antibody levels slowly decreased over several weeks but VIPIT did not recur in any of our patients. Continuation of anticoagulation in VIPIT patients at least until PF4 antibody negativity is reached seems reasonable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cases of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccinated patients with thrombocytopenia, elevated D-dimer, and elevated platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody levels with- and without thrombosis have been reported. No recommendations regarding the duration of anticoagulation have been made, because data on the long-term course beyond the first weeks is lacking.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To report on the treatment, medical course, and longitudinal follow-up of laboratory parameters in patients with vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT).
PATIENTS METHODS
We followed VIPIT patients with- (n = 3) and without (n = 3) venous thromboembolism fulfilling the aforementioned laboratory criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
Elevated D-dimer (median: 35.10 μg/ml, range: 17.80-52.70), thrombocytopenia (42 G/l, 20-101), and strong positivity in the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-enzyme-immunoassay (2.42 optical density [OD], 2.06-3.13; reference range < 0.50) were present in all patients after vaccination (10 days, 7-17). Routine laboratory parameters rapidly improved upon initiation of treatment (comprising therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation in all patients and high dose immunoglobulins ± corticosteroids in 5 patients). PF4 antibody levels slowly decreased over several weeks. Patients were discharged in good physical health (8 days, 5-13). VIPIT did not recur during follow-up (12 weeks, 8-17). Five of 6 patients fully recovered (in 2 patients thrombosis had resolved, in 1 patient exertional dyspnea persisted).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Remissions without sequelae can be achieved upon rapid initiation of treatment in patients with VIPIT. Platelet factor 4 antibody levels slowly decreased over several weeks but VIPIT did not recur in any of our patients. Continuation of anticoagulation in VIPIT patients at least until PF4 antibody negativity is reached seems reasonable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34624672
pii: S0049-3848(21)00469-2
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.09.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126-130

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Johannes Thaler (J)

Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Petra Jilma (P)

Department of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Nazanin Samadi (N)

Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Florian Roitner (F)

Department of Internal Medicine II, St. Josef Hospital, Braunau, Austria.

Eva Mikušková (E)

Department of Hematooncology 2, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Stephan Kudrnovsky-Moser (S)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Tulln, Austria.

Joachim Rettl (J)

Department of Internal Medicine, Haematology and Oncology, Clinical Center Klagenfurt, Austria.

Raphael Preiss (R)

Department of Medicine II, State Hospital Feldkirch, Austria.

Peter Quehenberger (P)

Department of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Ingrid Pabinger (I)

Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Paul Knoebl (P)

Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: paul.knoebl@muv.ac.at.

Cihan Ay (C)

Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH