Addressing misconceptions of flow disruption studies in "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery".
Flow disruptions
Robot-assisted surgery
Systems safety
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
07
09
2021
accepted:
03
10
2021
pubmed:
10
10
2021
medline:
28
7
2022
entrez:
9
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This letter to the editor provides a response to "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery." The authors provide much needed clarification on misconceptions of flow disruption studies. The evolving methodology is not aimed at creating a "non-stop" flow, or optimizing efficiency, but understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34626319
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0
pii: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0
pmc: PMC9724399
mid: NIHMS1845597
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
989-990Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS026491
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:244-54
pubmed: 26154223
J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):731-733
pubmed: 34283335
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Apr;119(4 Pt 1):661-72
pubmed: 10733754
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1015-1021
pubmed: 28971880
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):658-65
pubmed: 17981185
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1033-1045
pubmed: 32447319
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103559
pubmed: 34488190