On the usefulness of four in vitro methods in assessing the intraluminal performance of poorly soluble, ionisable compounds in the fasted state.

Biogit Biphasic Dissolution Dissolution-permeation PBPK modelling Precipitation

Journal

European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences
ISSN: 1879-0720
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pharm Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9317982

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 16 06 2021
revised: 03 09 2021
accepted: 05 10 2021
pubmed: 11 10 2021
medline: 17 12 2021
entrez: 10 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A small-scale two-stage biphasic system, a small-scale two-stage dissolution-permeation system, the Erweka mini-paddle apparatus, and the BioGIT system were evaluated for their usefulness in assessing the intraluminal performance of two low solubility drugs in the fasted state, one with weakly acidic properties (tested in a salt form, diclofenac potassium) and one with weakly alkaline properties [ritonavir, tested as an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation]. In all in vitro methods, an immediate-release tablet and a powder formulation of diclofenac potassium were both rapidly dissolved in Level II biorelevant media simulating the conditions in the upper small intestine. Physiologically based biopharmaceutics (PBB) modelling for the tablet formulation resulted in a successful simulation of the average plasma profile in adults, whereas for the powder formulation modelling indicated that gastric emptying and transport through the intestinal epithelium limit the absorption rates. Detailed information on the behaviour of the ritonavir ASD formulation under both simulated gastric and upper small intestinal conditions were crucial for understanding the luminal performance. PBB modelling showed that the dissolution and precipitation parameters, estimated from the Erweka mini-paddle apparatus data and the small-scale two-stage biphasic system data, respectively, were necessary to adequately simulate the average plasma profile after administration of the ritonavir ASD formulation. Simulation of the gastrointestinal transfer process from the stomach to the small intestine was necessary to evaluate the effects of hypochlorhydric conditions on the luminal performance of the ritonavir ASD formulation. Based on this study, the selection of the appropriate in vitro method for evaluating the intraluminal performance of ionisable lipophilic drugs depends on the characteristics of the drug substance. The results suggest that for (salts of) acidic drugs (e.g., diclofenac potassium) it is only an issue of availability and ease of operation of the apparatus. For weakly alkaline substances (e.g., ritonavir), the results indicate that the dynamic dissolution process needs to be simulated, with the type of requested information (e.g., dissolution parameters, precipitation parameters, luminal concentrations) being key for selecting the most appropriate method. Regardless of the ionisation characteristics, early in the drug development process the use of small-scale systems may be inevitable, due to the limited quantities of drug substance available.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34628003
pii: S0928-0987(21)00337-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106034
pmc: PMC8665220
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Tablets 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106034

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Références

Mol Pharm. 2017 Nov 6;14(11):3801-3814
pubmed: 28898584
Int J Pharm. 2018 Sep 5;548(1):636-641
pubmed: 29981414
J Pharm Sci. 2009 Dec;98(12):4941-61
pubmed: 19455625
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Sep;105(9):2677-2684
pubmed: 26505884
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Dec;291(3):1068-74
pubmed: 10565826
Mol Pharm. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):4305-4320
pubmed: 28771009
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Sep 1;137:105001
pubmed: 31301486
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 15;29(8):863-70
pubmed: 19170660
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):184-213
pubmed: 9314611
J Pharm Sci. 2019 Nov;108(11):3461-3477
pubmed: 31265846
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Feb;105(2):687-696
pubmed: 26375734
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Oct 1;138:105031
pubmed: 31386891
Pharm Res. 2011 Dec;28(12):3145-58
pubmed: 21674262
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017 Jun;115:94-101
pubmed: 28214603
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Aug 1;151:105377
pubmed: 32461076
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Mar 7;149:105297
pubmed: 32151705
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jan;59(1):80-4
pubmed: 15606444
J Pharm Sci. 2009 Aug;98(8):2549-72
pubmed: 19373886
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;66(1):23-31
pubmed: 24117531
Pharm Res. 2016 Jun;33(6):1399-412
pubmed: 26975361
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016 Jan 20;82:106-14
pubmed: 26594026
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 May 1;160:105750
pubmed: 33581261
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020 Oct;155:55-68
pubmed: 32781025
J Pharm Sci. 2009 Apr;98(4):1206-19
pubmed: 18752289
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998 Oct;35(4):275-91
pubmed: 9812178
AAPS J. 2017 Jul;19(4):989-1001
pubmed: 28516359
J Pharm Sci. 2019 Apr;108(4):1604-1618
pubmed: 30476508
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 May 1;102:284-298
pubmed: 28286289
Arzneimittelforschung. 2000 Jan;50(1):43-7
pubmed: 10683715
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(12):777-82
pubmed: 18991471
Int J Pharm. 2017 Jun 15;525(1):211-217
pubmed: 28414135
AAPS J. 2009 Jun;11(2):225-37
pubmed: 19381840
Pharm Res. 2013 Jun;30(6):1483-501
pubmed: 23543303
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Jul;28(1):121-4
pubmed: 2775611
Mol Pharm. 2010 Oct 4;7(5):1374-87
pubmed: 20698545
AAPS J. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):57
pubmed: 29600330
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;71(4):536-556
pubmed: 29956338
Drug Metab Dispos. 1997 Apr;25(4):489-501
pubmed: 9107549
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 May;68(5):678-91
pubmed: 26454138
AAPS J. 2018 May 24;20(4):71
pubmed: 29797293
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Mar 16;12(3):
pubmed: 32188116
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015 Jun;93:173-82
pubmed: 25836053
Drug Metab Dispos. 1998 Jun;26(6):552-61
pubmed: 9616191
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Jul 17;12(7):
pubmed: 32708859
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;16(6):405-10
pubmed: 527637
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(4):1179-84
pubmed: 19034672
Mol Pharm. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):4220-4232
pubmed: 28621952

Auteurs

Patrick J O'Dwyer (PJ)

Pion Inc. (UK) Ltd., Forest Row, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, Greece; School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland.

Karl J Box (KJ)

Pion Inc. (UK) Ltd., Forest Row, East Sussex, United Kingdom.

Georgios Imanidis (G)

University of Applied Sciences Northwest. Switzerland. School of Life Sciences, Institute of Pharma Technology, Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Basel, Switzerland.

Maria Vertzoni (M)

Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, Greece.

Christos Reppas (C)

Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, Greece. Electronic address: reppas@pharm.uoa.gr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs
Inclusion Bodies Solubility Recombinant Proteins Detergents Protein Denaturation
Animals Podocytes Fasting Humans Male

Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.

Eman Mostafa Awad, Mohamed Maamoun ElSheikh, Azza Abd El Moneim El-Segai
1.00
Dental Impression Technique Humans Dental Implants Computer-Aided Design Dental Impression Materials

Classifications MeSH