Practical considerations for a library's research data management services: the case of the National Institutes of Health Library.
case study
library services
research data management
Journal
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
ISSN: 1558-9439
Titre abrégé: J Med Libr Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101132728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2021
01 Jul 2021
Historique:
entrez:
11
10
2021
pubmed:
12
10
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigates research data management (RDM) services using a crosstab framework with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library as a case study to provide practical considerations for libraries seeking to improve their RDM services. We conducted semistructured interviews with four librarians who provide data services at the NIH Library regarding library user characteristics, RDM services provided, RDM infrastructure, and collaboration experiences. Through the analysis of interview transcripts, we identified and analyzed the NIH Library's RDM services according to Online Computer Library Center (OCLC)'s three categories of RDM services and the six stages of the data lifecycle. The findings show that the two models' crosstab framework can provide an overview of an institution's current RDM services and identify service gaps. The NIH Library tends to take more responsibility in providing education and expertise services while relying more on information technology departments for curation services. The library provides significant support for data creation, analysis, and sharing stages to meet biomedical researchers' needs, suggesting areas for potential expansion of RDM services in the less supported stages of data description, storage, and preservation. Based on these findings, we recommend three key considerations for libraries: identify gaps in current services, identify services that can be supported via partnerships, and get regular feedback from users. These findings provide a deeper understanding of RDM support on the basis of RDM service categories and the data lifecycle and promote discussion of issues to be considered for future improvements in RDM services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34629974
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.995
pii: jmla.2021.995
pmc: PMC8485941
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
450-458Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Soojung Kim, Sue Yeon Syn.
Références
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jan;107(1):89-97
pubmed: 30598653
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jan-Mar;37(1):97-104
pubmed: 29327993
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0147942
pubmed: 26886581
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):52-7
pubmed: 26807053
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):185-191
pubmed: 28377684
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 08;9(12):e114734
pubmed: 25485539
J Libr Adm. 2012;52(8):754-769
pubmed: 23585706
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506
pubmed: 26107811
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):303-9
pubmed: 24163602