Assessment of the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form Using Item Response Theory.


Journal

Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
ISSN: 1474-7049
Titre abrégé: Evol Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101219668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
entrez: 11 10 2021
pubmed: 12 10 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The mate retention inventory (MRI) has been a valuable tool in the field of evolutionary psychology for the past 30 years. The goal of the current research is to subject the MRI to rigorous psychometric analysis using item response theory to answer three broad questions. Do the individual items of the MRI fit the scale well? Does the overall function of the MRI match what is predicted? Finally, do men and women respond similarly to the MRI? Using a graded response model, it was found that all but two of the items fit acceptable model patterns. Test information function analysis found that the scale acceptably captures individual differences for participants with a high degree of mate retention but the scale is lacking in capturing information from participants with a low degree of mate retention. Finally, discriminate item function analysis reveals that the MRI is better at assessing male than female participants, indicating that the scale may not be the best indicator of female behavior in a relationship. Overall, we conclude that the MRI is a good scale, especially for assessing male behavior, but it could be improved for assessing female behavior and individuals lower on overall mate retention behavior. It is suggested that this paper be used as a framework for how the newest psychometrics techniques can be applied in order to create more robust and valid measures in the field of evolutionary psychology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34633890
doi: 10.1177/14747049211044150
pmc: PMC10358423
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14747049211044150

Références

Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Oct;41(5):1121-5
pubmed: 22089325
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Feb;72(2):346-61
pubmed: 9107005
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412
pubmed: 24844115
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:27-48
pubmed: 18976138
Horm Behav. 2012 Jan;61(1):114-20
pubmed: 22119340
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120
pubmed: 20037639
Hum Nat. 2016 Sep;27(3):316-33
pubmed: 27147537

Auteurs

Patrick J Nebl (PJ)

3198Department of Psychology, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, IL, USA.

Mark G McCoy (MG)

6061Department of Psychology, Manchester University, North Manchester, IN, USA.

Garett C Foster (GC)

1888Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

Michael J Zickar (MJ)

1888Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH